"Freedom granted only when it is known beforehand that its effects will be beneficial is not freedom"
About this Quote
Hayek draws a sharp line between permission and liberty. If authorities allow action only after they have certified its consequences as good, they have not freed people; they have merely licensed specific outcomes. Genuine freedom carries uncertainty, risk, and the possibility that many choices will not look beneficial at the start or even after the fact. Without that space for trial and error, individuals become instruments of plans made by others.
This point runs through Hayeks defense of liberalism, especially in The Constitution of Liberty and The Road to Serfdom. He argues that knowledge in society is dispersed, local, and often tacit. No central authority can foresee which experiments, ventures, or opinions will yield progress. Markets, science, and culture advance because people are free to try, fail, and occasionally discover something new. Requiring prior proof of benefit is impossible in principle and destructive in practice, because it suppresses the very experiments that produce knowledge.
The same logic applies to free speech. If only speech already judged harmless or useful is allowed, dissent, satire, and unpopular truths will be silenced. Freedom of conscience likewise means permitting beliefs the majority dislikes. In each case, the test of liberty is whether people may act without first convincing a gatekeeper that their choices will work out well.
Hayek also links freedom to the rule of law. General, predictable rules let people plan their lives while avoiding outcome-based controls. Once authorities reserve the right to permit or forbid actions based on expected results, they shift from law to discretion, and society slides toward paternalism and soft despotism.
The commitment Hayek asks for is not to any particular result but to an open process. Freedom means trusting the decentralized intelligence of individuals and the corrective forces of competition, criticism, and learning. It is a wager that the long-run benefits of autonomy and experimentation outweigh the short-run comfort of control.
This point runs through Hayeks defense of liberalism, especially in The Constitution of Liberty and The Road to Serfdom. He argues that knowledge in society is dispersed, local, and often tacit. No central authority can foresee which experiments, ventures, or opinions will yield progress. Markets, science, and culture advance because people are free to try, fail, and occasionally discover something new. Requiring prior proof of benefit is impossible in principle and destructive in practice, because it suppresses the very experiments that produce knowledge.
The same logic applies to free speech. If only speech already judged harmless or useful is allowed, dissent, satire, and unpopular truths will be silenced. Freedom of conscience likewise means permitting beliefs the majority dislikes. In each case, the test of liberty is whether people may act without first convincing a gatekeeper that their choices will work out well.
Hayek also links freedom to the rule of law. General, predictable rules let people plan their lives while avoiding outcome-based controls. Once authorities reserve the right to permit or forbid actions based on expected results, they shift from law to discretion, and society slides toward paternalism and soft despotism.
The commitment Hayek asks for is not to any particular result but to an open process. Freedom means trusting the decentralized intelligence of individuals and the corrective forces of competition, criticism, and learning. It is a wager that the long-run benefits of autonomy and experimentation outweigh the short-run comfort of control.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Friedrich
Add to List
