"Freedom only for the members of the government, only for the members of the Party - though they are quite numerous - is no freedom at all"
About this Quote
The subtext is sharper: a party can expand its membership and still remain an aristocracy. Quantity doesn’t redeem exclusion; it just widens the VIP lounge. Luxemburg is calling out the way revolutionary legitimacy can be manufactured through participation that’s conditional, curated, and revocable. When dissent becomes synonymous with betrayal, “freedom” becomes a management tool - a reward for compliance.
The intent isn’t libertarian romance about individualism. It’s a hardheaded diagnosis of how authoritarianism is born: not in a single coup, but in the bureaucratic habit of deciding who counts as “the people.” Luxemburg, a socialist who believed in mass politics, insists that a revolution that can’t tolerate its critics will eventually stop needing its citizens at all. Freedom that doesn’t apply to opponents is just power wearing an ethical mask.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Luxemburg, Rosa. (2026, January 16). Freedom only for the members of the government, only for the members of the Party - though they are quite numerous - is no freedom at all. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/freedom-only-for-the-members-of-the-government-83811/
Chicago Style
Luxemburg, Rosa. "Freedom only for the members of the government, only for the members of the Party - though they are quite numerous - is no freedom at all." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/freedom-only-for-the-members-of-the-government-83811/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Freedom only for the members of the government, only for the members of the Party - though they are quite numerous - is no freedom at all." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/freedom-only-for-the-members-of-the-government-83811/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.












