"Friends need not agree in everything or go always together, or have no comparable other friendships of the same intimacy"
About this Quote
Santayana is puncturing a stubborn romantic myth about friendship: that real closeness requires constant alignment, constant proximity, and a kind of exclusivity pact. For a philosopher who spent his life watching ideas harden into identities, the line is quietly radical. It treats friendship less as a merger and more as a durable architecture that can handle load-bearing differences.
The phrasing matters. "Need not" is a deliberate de-escalation; he is refusing the moral panic that disagreement so often triggers. "Agree in everything" targets the fantasy of total consonance, the kind that turns friendship into an echo chamber. "Go always together" widens the critique from beliefs to behavior: you can be close without sharing every itinerary, every cause, every social scene. Then the sharpest clause: "or have no comparable other friendships of the same intimacy". Santayana is arguing against possessiveness disguised as loyalty. Intimacy, in his model, is not a scarce resource to be guarded but a capacity that can exist in plural forms.
The subtext is a warning about coercion. When friendship demands unanimity and exclusivity, it stops being a relationship and becomes a soft institution, policing taste, politics, and attention. Santayana is also giving permission: to keep friends across disagreements, to let bonds breathe, to accept that people contain multitudes of need and connection.
In context, this reads like an early antidote to the modern impulse to sort relationships into all-or-nothing categories. It’s a philosophy of friendship built for real life: elastic, non-totalizing, and mature enough to survive difference without treating it as betrayal.
The phrasing matters. "Need not" is a deliberate de-escalation; he is refusing the moral panic that disagreement so often triggers. "Agree in everything" targets the fantasy of total consonance, the kind that turns friendship into an echo chamber. "Go always together" widens the critique from beliefs to behavior: you can be close without sharing every itinerary, every cause, every social scene. Then the sharpest clause: "or have no comparable other friendships of the same intimacy". Santayana is arguing against possessiveness disguised as loyalty. Intimacy, in his model, is not a scarce resource to be guarded but a capacity that can exist in plural forms.
The subtext is a warning about coercion. When friendship demands unanimity and exclusivity, it stops being a relationship and becomes a soft institution, policing taste, politics, and attention. Santayana is also giving permission: to keep friends across disagreements, to let bonds breathe, to accept that people contain multitudes of need and connection.
In context, this reads like an early antidote to the modern impulse to sort relationships into all-or-nothing categories. It’s a philosophy of friendship built for real life: elastic, non-totalizing, and mature enough to survive difference without treating it as betrayal.
Quote Details
| Topic | Friendship |
|---|
More Quotes by George
Add to List







