"From a parent's right to know what their children are doing, to protecting citizens across the country from the growing threat of gang violence, the House Democrat leadership is simply out to lunch"
About this Quote
A neat trick of political language is turning two unrelated anxieties into one indictment, and Virginia Foxx does it here with a practiced snap. She pairs “a parent’s right to know what their children are doing” with “the growing threat of gang violence,” stitching together domestic unease and public-safety panic into a single narrative of Democratic negligence. The move isn’t about evidence; it’s about emotional bundling. If leadership is failing on your kid, it must be failing on your street. If it’s failing on gangs, it must be hiding something about your school.
The phrase “right to know” is doing heavy work. It frames oversight not as preference or policy choice but as moral entitlement, implying that any resistance is suspicious, even anti-family. In contemporary legislative fights, that language often circles issues like school curricula, student privacy, and LGBTQ youth policies without naming them directly. The vagueness is strategic: it invites supporters to project their specific grievance into the sentence while keeping the accusation broad enough to travel on cable news.
Then comes the punchline: “simply out to lunch.” It’s a folksy, contemptuous idiom that sidesteps policy argument in favor of competence theater. Not corrupt, not merely mistaken - absent. That insult is designed for repetition, a quick caption under a clip. The subtext is clear: Democrats aren’t just wrong; they’re unserious caretakers in a moment of supposed crisis. The context is a party-line messaging environment where sounding decisive matters as much as being precise, and where fear, once invoked, becomes a multipurpose political solvent.
The phrase “right to know” is doing heavy work. It frames oversight not as preference or policy choice but as moral entitlement, implying that any resistance is suspicious, even anti-family. In contemporary legislative fights, that language often circles issues like school curricula, student privacy, and LGBTQ youth policies without naming them directly. The vagueness is strategic: it invites supporters to project their specific grievance into the sentence while keeping the accusation broad enough to travel on cable news.
Then comes the punchline: “simply out to lunch.” It’s a folksy, contemptuous idiom that sidesteps policy argument in favor of competence theater. Not corrupt, not merely mistaken - absent. That insult is designed for repetition, a quick caption under a clip. The subtext is clear: Democrats aren’t just wrong; they’re unserious caretakers in a moment of supposed crisis. The context is a party-line messaging environment where sounding decisive matters as much as being precise, and where fear, once invoked, becomes a multipurpose political solvent.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Virginia
Add to List
