"From the bitter cold winter at Valley Forge, to the mountains of Afghanistan and the deserts of Iraq, our soldiers have courageously answered when called, gone where ordered, and defended our nation with honor"
About this Quote
Ortiz builds a patriotic bridge across centuries, stapling Valley Forge to Afghanistan and Iraq as if they belong to one seamless moral story. That’s the point: by invoking the Revolutionary War’s most mythologized hardship, he borrows its unimpeachable legitimacy and transfers it to contemporary conflicts that were, for many Americans, messier and more contested. Valley Forge isn’t just history here; it’s a rhetorical stamp of purity.
The sentence is engineered around obedience: “answered when called, gone where ordered.” It praises soldiers less as independent moral agents than as embodiments of duty. That’s politically useful. It lets an elected official honor military service without touching the tinderbox question of whether the missions themselves were wise, just, or competently run. The subtext is a kind of civic truce: whatever you think of the war, you’re expected to affirm the warrior.
Notice the geography: “mountains” and “deserts” are cinematic terrain words, compressing complex societies into backdrops for American endurance. The conflicts become environments, not political choices. “Defended our nation” performs the same move, translating offensive or ambiguous campaigns into defense, the only posture that reliably commands broad consent.
In context, this reads like floor-speech patriotism from the post-9/11 era, when public rhetoric often fused gratitude with discipline, and when legislators sought a language that insulated troop veneration from policy accountability. It works because it flatters listeners into belonging to a continuous national saga while quietly editing out the arguments that shaped each chapter.
The sentence is engineered around obedience: “answered when called, gone where ordered.” It praises soldiers less as independent moral agents than as embodiments of duty. That’s politically useful. It lets an elected official honor military service without touching the tinderbox question of whether the missions themselves were wise, just, or competently run. The subtext is a kind of civic truce: whatever you think of the war, you’re expected to affirm the warrior.
Notice the geography: “mountains” and “deserts” are cinematic terrain words, compressing complex societies into backdrops for American endurance. The conflicts become environments, not political choices. “Defended our nation” performs the same move, translating offensive or ambiguous campaigns into defense, the only posture that reliably commands broad consent.
In context, this reads like floor-speech patriotism from the post-9/11 era, when public rhetoric often fused gratitude with discipline, and when legislators sought a language that insulated troop veneration from policy accountability. It works because it flatters listeners into belonging to a continuous national saga while quietly editing out the arguments that shaped each chapter.
Quote Details
| Topic | Military & Soldier |
|---|
More Quotes by Solomon
Add to List
