"From the perspective of mere representation, the external world always remains only a phenomenon"
About this Quote
Representation is the bait word here: it sounds modest, technical, harmless. Dilthey uses it to spring a trap on the self-confidence of modern knowledge. If what we have is "mere representation", then the world we talk about - nature, society, even our own past - shows up to us not as raw reality but as appearance, as something already filtered through the forms by which we picture, describe, and measure. "Only a phenomenon" is not a shrug; its chill comes from how decisively it demotes the external world from solid ground to what is given to consciousness under conditions we don’t control.
The intent is diagnostic. Dilthey is writing in the long shadow of Kant, but he’s not just replaying the philosopher’s boundary line between things-as-they-are and things-as-they-appear. As a historian, he’s fighting a 19th-century temptation: to treat human life as if it were simply another object for the natural sciences to represent, categorize, and explain from the outside. If external reality remains phenomenon at the level of representation, then history cannot be reduced to a detached, camera-like record. It must be approached through lived experience, meaning, interpretation - what Dilthey calls Verstehen.
The subtext is a warning against intellectual imperialism. Claims of pure objectivity often smuggle in a viewpoint and call it reality. Dilthey’s line forces a more honest bargain: you can map the world, but you can’t pretend the map is the territory, especially when the territory is human life.
The intent is diagnostic. Dilthey is writing in the long shadow of Kant, but he’s not just replaying the philosopher’s boundary line between things-as-they-are and things-as-they-appear. As a historian, he’s fighting a 19th-century temptation: to treat human life as if it were simply another object for the natural sciences to represent, categorize, and explain from the outside. If external reality remains phenomenon at the level of representation, then history cannot be reduced to a detached, camera-like record. It must be approached through lived experience, meaning, interpretation - what Dilthey calls Verstehen.
The subtext is a warning against intellectual imperialism. Claims of pure objectivity often smuggle in a viewpoint and call it reality. Dilthey’s line forces a more honest bargain: you can map the world, but you can’t pretend the map is the territory, especially when the territory is human life.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Wilhelm
Add to List
