"From the perspective of mere representation, the external world always remains only a phenomenon"
About this Quote
The intent is diagnostic. Dilthey is writing in the long shadow of Kant, but he’s not just replaying the philosopher’s boundary line between things-as-they-are and things-as-they-appear. As a historian, he’s fighting a 19th-century temptation: to treat human life as if it were simply another object for the natural sciences to represent, categorize, and explain from the outside. If external reality remains phenomenon at the level of representation, then history cannot be reduced to a detached, camera-like record. It must be approached through lived experience, meaning, interpretation - what Dilthey calls Verstehen.
The subtext is a warning against intellectual imperialism. Claims of pure objectivity often smuggle in a viewpoint and call it reality. Dilthey’s line forces a more honest bargain: you can map the world, but you can’t pretend the map is the territory, especially when the territory is human life.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Dilthey, Wilhelm. (2026, January 17). From the perspective of mere representation, the external world always remains only a phenomenon. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/from-the-perspective-of-mere-representation-the-73388/
Chicago Style
Dilthey, Wilhelm. "From the perspective of mere representation, the external world always remains only a phenomenon." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/from-the-perspective-of-mere-representation-the-73388/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"From the perspective of mere representation, the external world always remains only a phenomenon." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/from-the-perspective-of-mere-representation-the-73388/. Accessed 13 Feb. 2026.









