"Fundamentalism as it is called is not confined to the Muslim world. It is something that we have seen in different parts of the world. Let us hope that a dialogue between the followers of the three great monotheistic religions could help in putting an end to this"
About this Quote
Hussein’s line reads like diplomacy, but it’s diplomacy with a target: the lazy reflex to treat “fundamentalism” as an export product of the Muslim world. By opening with “as it is called,” he quietly questions the label itself - not denying the phenomenon, but flagging how the word gets weaponized, simplified, and pinned to one civilization for Western comfort. The move is shrewd: he concedes the fear without conceding the frame.
Context matters. Hussein governed Jordan in a region repeatedly squeezed between wars, refugee flows, and superpower agendas, while also navigating a domestic landscape where religious identity could be both glue and fuse. A king who survived coup attempts and regional upheavals is speaking as a professional manager of volatility. His real subject isn’t theology; it’s political contagion. “Different parts of the world” is deliberate vagueness that invites listeners to supply their own examples - Christian militancy, Jewish extremism, Hindu nationalism - without forcing him to pick a public fight.
Then he offers “dialogue” among “the three great monotheistic religions” as both moral appeal and tactical bridge-building. It’s aspirational, but also defensive: a call to relocate the conversation from security crackdowns and civilizational blame to shared stewardship by religious communities. The subtext is that states alone can’t police belief into moderation; legitimacy has to be co-produced by clerics, citizens, and institutions across borders.
“Let us hope” sounds soft, yet it’s a constraint he’s naming: without interfaith buy-in, the extremists get to audition as the only authentic voices.
Context matters. Hussein governed Jordan in a region repeatedly squeezed between wars, refugee flows, and superpower agendas, while also navigating a domestic landscape where religious identity could be both glue and fuse. A king who survived coup attempts and regional upheavals is speaking as a professional manager of volatility. His real subject isn’t theology; it’s political contagion. “Different parts of the world” is deliberate vagueness that invites listeners to supply their own examples - Christian militancy, Jewish extremism, Hindu nationalism - without forcing him to pick a public fight.
Then he offers “dialogue” among “the three great monotheistic religions” as both moral appeal and tactical bridge-building. It’s aspirational, but also defensive: a call to relocate the conversation from security crackdowns and civilizational blame to shared stewardship by religious communities. The subtext is that states alone can’t police belief into moderation; legitimacy has to be co-produced by clerics, citizens, and institutions across borders.
“Let us hope” sounds soft, yet it’s a constraint he’s naming: without interfaith buy-in, the extremists get to audition as the only authentic voices.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by King
Add to List
