"Further, there are things of which the mind understands one part, but remains ignorant of the other; and when man is able to comprehend certain things, it does not follow that he must be able to comprehend everything"
About this Quote
A medieval insistence on intellectual humility, delivered with the cool confidence of someone who thinks humility is a form of rigor. Maimonides is pushing back against a perennial temptation: once you’ve cracked a few hard problems, you start mistaking competence for omniscience. His line slices that impulse down to size. The mind, he argues, can grasp “one part” of a thing while remaining blind to the rest; partial understanding isn’t a failure, it’s the normal condition of being human.
The intent here is defensive as much as philosophical. Writing in a world where Aristotelian science, revealed religion, and emerging rational inquiry were colliding, Maimonides is policing the border between what reason can responsibly claim and what it cannot. The subtext is a warning aimed at two audiences at once: the rationalist who wants metaphysics to behave like geometry, and the literalist who assumes that if something can’t be fully explained, it must be dismissed. He refuses both shortcuts. Human intelligence is real, powerful, and bounded.
What makes the passage work is its measured logic. It doesn’t romanticize mystery; it normalizes limits. That shift matters: ignorance isn’t a moral defect but a structural feature of cognition. In today’s terms, it reads like an antidote to confident punditry and algorithmic certainty alike. Expertise is local, not total; insight in one domain doesn’t entitle you to speak as if the universe owes you transparency. Maimonides’ restraint is not modesty theater. It’s an argument for disciplined thinking in an age that keeps confusing having answers with being right.
The intent here is defensive as much as philosophical. Writing in a world where Aristotelian science, revealed religion, and emerging rational inquiry were colliding, Maimonides is policing the border between what reason can responsibly claim and what it cannot. The subtext is a warning aimed at two audiences at once: the rationalist who wants metaphysics to behave like geometry, and the literalist who assumes that if something can’t be fully explained, it must be dismissed. He refuses both shortcuts. Human intelligence is real, powerful, and bounded.
What makes the passage work is its measured logic. It doesn’t romanticize mystery; it normalizes limits. That shift matters: ignorance isn’t a moral defect but a structural feature of cognition. In today’s terms, it reads like an antidote to confident punditry and algorithmic certainty alike. Expertise is local, not total; insight in one domain doesn’t entitle you to speak as if the universe owes you transparency. Maimonides’ restraint is not modesty theater. It’s an argument for disciplined thinking in an age that keeps confusing having answers with being right.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Maimonides
Add to List










