"Gay Liberation? I ain't against it, it's just that there's nothing in it for me"
About this Quote
The subtext is Hollywood, mid-century and beyond, where queer people were everywhere and nowhere at once - essential to the machinery (stylists, writers, confidants, coded performances), but systematically pushed off the official story. Davis, a star built on playing women who refuse to be liked, weaponizes that persona here: she makes selfishness sound like a cleared throat. It’s funny because it’s recognizable; it’s also unsettling because it names a common alibi. People who benefit from progressive cultural shifts can afford to be passionate. People who don’t see themselves in the stakes can afford to be “not against it.”
Context matters: Davis came from an era when public alignment with gay rights wasn’t a low-risk virtue signal; it could be career-torquing, socially costly. The quote reads as both a dodge and a snapshot of a world where empathy is optional unless it flatters your own reflection.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sarcastic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Davis, Bette. (2026, January 18). Gay Liberation? I ain't against it, it's just that there's nothing in it for me. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/gay-liberation-i-aint-against-it-its-just-that-16776/
Chicago Style
Davis, Bette. "Gay Liberation? I ain't against it, it's just that there's nothing in it for me." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/gay-liberation-i-aint-against-it-its-just-that-16776/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Gay Liberation? I ain't against it, it's just that there's nothing in it for me." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/gay-liberation-i-aint-against-it-its-just-that-16776/. Accessed 21 Feb. 2026.




