"Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous"
About this Quote
Philosophy, by contrast, is portrayed as harmless precisely because it lacks enforcement mechanisms. A bad argument can waste time, inflate egos, and spawn an absurd system-building hobbyhorse, but it can’t compel obedience at scale. “Only ridiculous” is Hume’s Enlightenment bet that reasoned disputation is a self-limiting game: the worst consequence is embarrassment, because its currency is persuasion rather than coercion.
The subtext is also strategic self-defense. Hume wrote under conditions where religious heterodoxy carried real risk (censure, career damage, accusations of atheism). Calling philosophical errors “ridiculous” flatters polite society’s tolerance for abstract debate, while smuggling in a sharper claim: the truly perilous irrationality is the kind that dresses itself as sacred certainty.
Context matters: this is the 18th-century argument for skepticism as public safety. Hume isn’t saying philosophy can’t be wrong; he’s saying its wrongness doesn’t typically come with an army.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Hume, David. (2026, January 17). Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/generally-speaking-the-errors-in-religion-are-67618/
Chicago Style
Hume, David. "Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/generally-speaking-the-errors-in-religion-are-67618/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/generally-speaking-the-errors-in-religion-are-67618/. Accessed 10 Feb. 2026.







