"George Bush doesn't represent any civilization!"
About this Quote
A line like this isn’t aimed at George W. Bush the man so much as at the moral costume his presidency tried to wear. Galloway’s sting comes from flipping a familiar post-9/11 script: the White House framed its wars as “civilization” defending itself against “barbarism.” By declaring Bush outside civilization altogether, Galloway seizes the same grand vocabulary and turns it into an indictment.
The intent is pure delegitimization. Not “wrong,” not “misguided,” but unqualified to speak for the civilizational order he invokes. It’s a politician’s insult engineered to travel: short, absolute, impossible to miss on a headline or in a parliamentary clash. The subtext is even sharper: if Bush doesn’t represent civilization, then the policies done in civilization’s name - Iraq, “shock and awe,” Guantanamo, torture memos, pre-emptive war doctrine - are recast as acts of savagery dressed up as virtue. Galloway isn’t merely condemning outcomes; he’s condemning the hypocrisy of moral language used to license violence.
Context matters because Galloway’s brand is oppositional theater with an anti-imperialist backbone. As a British figure attacking an American president, he’s also performing a kind of transatlantic dissent: refusing the assumption that “the West” speaks with one voice. The provocation works because it’s structurally unfair on purpose; “civilization” is too big a thing for any leader to “represent,” which is precisely why claiming it is such a powerful political move - and why stripping that claim away hits like a slap.
The intent is pure delegitimization. Not “wrong,” not “misguided,” but unqualified to speak for the civilizational order he invokes. It’s a politician’s insult engineered to travel: short, absolute, impossible to miss on a headline or in a parliamentary clash. The subtext is even sharper: if Bush doesn’t represent civilization, then the policies done in civilization’s name - Iraq, “shock and awe,” Guantanamo, torture memos, pre-emptive war doctrine - are recast as acts of savagery dressed up as virtue. Galloway isn’t merely condemning outcomes; he’s condemning the hypocrisy of moral language used to license violence.
Context matters because Galloway’s brand is oppositional theater with an anti-imperialist backbone. As a British figure attacking an American president, he’s also performing a kind of transatlantic dissent: refusing the assumption that “the West” speaks with one voice. The provocation works because it’s structurally unfair on purpose; “civilization” is too big a thing for any leader to “represent,” which is precisely why claiming it is such a powerful political move - and why stripping that claim away hits like a slap.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by George
Add to List








