"George Bush has shown great skill at disguising an incredibly weak foreign policy"
About this Quote
There’s a neat little trapdoor in Brad Sherman’s line: it pretends to compliment while it sharpens the knife. “Great skill” reads like praise, but it’s praise for concealment, not competence. The sentence is engineered to land with the sting of a backhanded accolade: Bush isn’t strong on foreign policy, Sherman suggests; he’s strong at making weakness look like strength.
The intent is political jujitsu. Instead of litigating the details of any single decision, Sherman targets presentation itself: the stagecraft of resolve, the choreography of speeches, the framing devices that turn ambiguity into “leadership.” That move matters because voters often experience foreign policy less as a ledger of outcomes than as a mood - confidence, clarity, toughness. Sherman’s subtext is that Bush’s real achievement is narrative dominance: turning simplistic binaries and patriotic cues into a shield against scrutiny.
Contextually, it taps a familiar anxiety in American politics: presidents can launder strategic thinness through rhetoric and imagery, especially when national security is treated as a test of posture. The line also positions Sherman as a truth-teller inside the system, implying that what’s being sold to the public is performance, not policy.
It works because it’s specific without being prosecutable. “Incredibly weak” is a verdict; “disguising” is an accusation about method; neither requires Sherman to cite a footnote in the moment. The audience fills in the grievances. The punch lands not on Bush’s ideology, but on his competence and candor - the two traits presidents most need when the stakes are global.
The intent is political jujitsu. Instead of litigating the details of any single decision, Sherman targets presentation itself: the stagecraft of resolve, the choreography of speeches, the framing devices that turn ambiguity into “leadership.” That move matters because voters often experience foreign policy less as a ledger of outcomes than as a mood - confidence, clarity, toughness. Sherman’s subtext is that Bush’s real achievement is narrative dominance: turning simplistic binaries and patriotic cues into a shield against scrutiny.
Contextually, it taps a familiar anxiety in American politics: presidents can launder strategic thinness through rhetoric and imagery, especially when national security is treated as a test of posture. The line also positions Sherman as a truth-teller inside the system, implying that what’s being sold to the public is performance, not policy.
It works because it’s specific without being prosecutable. “Incredibly weak” is a verdict; “disguising” is an accusation about method; neither requires Sherman to cite a footnote in the moment. The audience fills in the grievances. The punch lands not on Bush’s ideology, but on his competence and candor - the two traits presidents most need when the stakes are global.
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Brad
Add to List






