"Getting to the pint where the other is not the enemy is a big leap"
About this Quote
Crouch’s line lands like a barroom proverb with a blade inside it: “Getting to the pint where the other is not the enemy is a big leap.” The near-homophone pun (pint/point) isn’t just a typo to be politely corrected; it’s an accidental truth. Crouch spent a career arguing in public, often in the key of combat, and he knew how easily debate turns into tribal drinking - a ritual of belonging where the “other” is the designated threat. A pint is where factions are fortified.
His specific intent is to name the hardest civic skill: crossing the psychological border from suspicion to curiosity. “Not the enemy” is a low bar, deliberately. He’s not asking for love, harmony, or enlightened consensus; he’s describing the moment you stop needing an antagonist to feel coherent. That’s why “big leap” matters. It isn’t a gentle evolution. It’s a risky break with the dopamine economy of outrage and the comfort of moral certainty.
The subtext, consistent with Crouch’s work on jazz, race, and American cultural life, is that pluralism isn’t a posture; it’s discipline. Jazz is a useful echo here: improvisation depends on listening to someone else’s line without treating it as an attack. Crouch’s critique culture thrived on argument, but he’s warning that when “the other” becomes enemy by default, you don’t get sharper thinking - you get smaller thinking, locked into performance.
Contextually, this reads as late-20th/early-21st century American commentary in miniature: a country fluent in identity and grievance, less practiced at the muscular humility of coexistence. The leap is psychological, but the consequences are political.
His specific intent is to name the hardest civic skill: crossing the psychological border from suspicion to curiosity. “Not the enemy” is a low bar, deliberately. He’s not asking for love, harmony, or enlightened consensus; he’s describing the moment you stop needing an antagonist to feel coherent. That’s why “big leap” matters. It isn’t a gentle evolution. It’s a risky break with the dopamine economy of outrage and the comfort of moral certainty.
The subtext, consistent with Crouch’s work on jazz, race, and American cultural life, is that pluralism isn’t a posture; it’s discipline. Jazz is a useful echo here: improvisation depends on listening to someone else’s line without treating it as an attack. Crouch’s critique culture thrived on argument, but he’s warning that when “the other” becomes enemy by default, you don’t get sharper thinking - you get smaller thinking, locked into performance.
Contextually, this reads as late-20th/early-21st century American commentary in miniature: a country fluent in identity and grievance, less practiced at the muscular humility of coexistence. The leap is psychological, but the consequences are political.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Stanley
Add to List








