"Give to every human being every right that you claim for yourself"
About this Quote
Ingersoll’s line lands like a courtroom cross-examination disguised as a moral maxim: if you can’t universalize your rights, you don’t actually believe in rights - you believe in privileges. The genius is its simplicity. “Every right” is absolute, almost reckless; it leaves no wiggle room for genteel exceptions, no room for the era’s favorite dodge that freedom is a reward for “fitness,” faith, race, gender, or class. As a lawyer, Ingersoll knows how rights get hollowed out in practice: with footnotes, qualifications, and supposedly “reasonable” exclusions that always seem to protect the already protected.
The specific intent is pressure. It forces the listener to run a quick internal audit: Which rights do I quietly hoard? Voting, speech, bodily autonomy, due process, education, marriage, mobility, safety from violence? The phrasing makes hypocrisy sound not merely unattractive but logically incoherent. You can’t claim a principle and then treat it as private property.
The subtext is also a rebuke to moral hierarchies. Ingersoll, a famed agnostic and “Great Agnostic” lecturer in an America steeped in Protestant certainty, is smuggling in a secular ethic: dignity doesn’t come from divine endorsement or social rank; it comes from mutual recognition. That’s why “every human being” matters - not “citizen,” not “man,” not “the deserving.”
Context sharpens the edge. Ingersoll spoke in the post-Civil War United States, when emancipation was being undermined by Jim Crow, women were denied the vote, and immigrants were targets of nativist panic. The line reads as an antidote to the national habit of declaring liberty while rationing it. It still stings because it offers no alibi: equality is not a sentiment; it’s a standard.
The specific intent is pressure. It forces the listener to run a quick internal audit: Which rights do I quietly hoard? Voting, speech, bodily autonomy, due process, education, marriage, mobility, safety from violence? The phrasing makes hypocrisy sound not merely unattractive but logically incoherent. You can’t claim a principle and then treat it as private property.
The subtext is also a rebuke to moral hierarchies. Ingersoll, a famed agnostic and “Great Agnostic” lecturer in an America steeped in Protestant certainty, is smuggling in a secular ethic: dignity doesn’t come from divine endorsement or social rank; it comes from mutual recognition. That’s why “every human being” matters - not “citizen,” not “man,” not “the deserving.”
Context sharpens the edge. Ingersoll spoke in the post-Civil War United States, when emancipation was being undermined by Jim Crow, women were denied the vote, and immigrants were targets of nativist panic. The line reads as an antidote to the national habit of declaring liberty while rationing it. It still stings because it offers no alibi: equality is not a sentiment; it’s a standard.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Unverified source: The Limitations of Toleration (Robert G. Ingersoll, 1888)
Evidence: Speech delivered May 8, 1888; later in Works vol. VII (often cited p. 258 in collected editions). Primary source wording is slightly longer than the popular standalone quote: Ingersoll states, "my religion is simply this: First. Give to every other human being every right that you claim for yours... Other candidates (1) Robert G. Ingersoll (Robert G. Ingersoll) compilation98.3% d gods 1885 give to every human being every right that you claim for yourself the |
| Featured | This quote was our Quote of the Day on December 2, 2023 |
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List





