"Global conditions are far too complex to be able to imagine that they could ever be really controlled by one power"
About this Quote
Beck’s sentence is a polite demolition of the fantasy that someone, somewhere, is “in charge.” The phrasing is calibrated: “far too complex” sounds like technocratic modesty, but it’s really a critique of empire-era confidence recycled into the late-20th-century policy state. He’s not denying power; he’s denying the plausibility of total command in a world where consequences ricochet across borders, supply chains, atmospheres, and screens.
The key move is his choice of “imagine.” That verb frames control as a narrative impulse before it’s a strategy: a psychological and political comfort object. States, superpowers, and their publics like the idea of a single steering wheel because it makes risk feel negotiable. Beck’s broader work on the “risk society” sits behind this line: modernity doesn’t just produce wealth and progress; it manufactures hazards (financial contagion, climate change, terrorism, pandemics) that no passport control can stop and no national plan can fully price in.
Context matters: post-Cold War triumphalism promised a unipolar world with a clear manager. Beck punctures that, arguing that globality isn’t just “big politics,” it’s interdependence and side effects. The subtext is almost ethical: when control is impossible, responsibility can’t be monopolized either. His warning lands as both diagnosis and rebuke: claims of mastery are often performances meant to justify intervention, austerity, surveillance, or blame-shifting when systems misfire. Complexity becomes the argument against hubris.
The key move is his choice of “imagine.” That verb frames control as a narrative impulse before it’s a strategy: a psychological and political comfort object. States, superpowers, and their publics like the idea of a single steering wheel because it makes risk feel negotiable. Beck’s broader work on the “risk society” sits behind this line: modernity doesn’t just produce wealth and progress; it manufactures hazards (financial contagion, climate change, terrorism, pandemics) that no passport control can stop and no national plan can fully price in.
Context matters: post-Cold War triumphalism promised a unipolar world with a clear manager. Beck punctures that, arguing that globality isn’t just “big politics,” it’s interdependence and side effects. The subtext is almost ethical: when control is impossible, responsibility can’t be monopolized either. His warning lands as both diagnosis and rebuke: claims of mastery are often performances meant to justify intervention, austerity, surveillance, or blame-shifting when systems misfire. Complexity becomes the argument against hubris.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Ulrich
Add to List




