"God cannot be reduced to a sample for analysis"
About this Quote
The intent isn’t anti-intellectual so much as anti-reductionist. Pike is warning that method can become a kind of metaphysical bully: if it can’t be sampled, it doesn’t count. By saying “sample,” he targets the quiet arrogance of modern research culture, the assumption that reality must be divisible into manageable units before it becomes legitimate knowledge. The subtext: some objects of inquiry aren’t just bigger than our tools; they’re categorically different from what those tools are designed to touch.
Context matters here because Pike’s era was saturated with projects that tried to translate the human (belief, morality, meaning) into the measurable. In that climate, “God” stands in for more than theology. It’s shorthand for ultimacy, transcendence, the total frame that gives experience its shape. A sample implies representativeness; Pike suggests that divinity, by definition, resists being represented by a part. The quote works because it turns a technical term into a philosophical critique, exposing how quickly “rigor” can become a subtle form of impoverishment.
Quote Details
| Topic | God |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Pike, Kenneth L. (2026, January 18). God cannot be reduced to a sample for analysis. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/god-cannot-be-reduced-to-a-sample-for-analysis-21524/
Chicago Style
Pike, Kenneth L. "God cannot be reduced to a sample for analysis." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/god-cannot-be-reduced-to-a-sample-for-analysis-21524/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"God cannot be reduced to a sample for analysis." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/god-cannot-be-reduced-to-a-sample-for-analysis-21524/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.










