"God himself took this human flesh upon him"
About this Quote
A single line, almost blunt in its simplicity, that carries an entire theology on its back: not God visiting humanity, not God sending an emissary, but God wearing the mess. Barclay’s phrasing is doing deliberate work. “God himself” forecloses the escape hatch of metaphor or “mere inspiration.” It insists on proximity, on presence without intermediaries. Then comes the tactile jolt: “this human flesh.” Not “human nature” or “human form” - words that can stay politely abstract - but “flesh,” the term that drags divinity into sweat, fatigue, hunger, vulnerability, and the indignities of a body that can be wounded.
The intent is pastoral as much as doctrinal. Barclay, a 20th-century Scottish theologian with a gift for accessible exposition, is translating the Christian claim of the Incarnation into plain, forceful English for ordinary readers. The subtext is corrective: against a sanitized, distant God; against a “spiritual” faith that dodges the material world; against the temptation to treat Jesus as simply a moral teacher. This is Christianity’s scandal and its comfort in the same breath: if God has taken flesh, then human life - including suffering and limitation - becomes a site of divine seriousness, not divine absence.
Context matters: Barclay wrote in a century bruised by world wars and modern skepticism. “Flesh” is not a decorative noun there; it’s a rebuttal to the idea that God stays safely above history. The line works because it refuses both sentimentality and abstraction, staking faith on an almost shocking concreteness.
The intent is pastoral as much as doctrinal. Barclay, a 20th-century Scottish theologian with a gift for accessible exposition, is translating the Christian claim of the Incarnation into plain, forceful English for ordinary readers. The subtext is corrective: against a sanitized, distant God; against a “spiritual” faith that dodges the material world; against the temptation to treat Jesus as simply a moral teacher. This is Christianity’s scandal and its comfort in the same breath: if God has taken flesh, then human life - including suffering and limitation - becomes a site of divine seriousness, not divine absence.
Context matters: Barclay wrote in a century bruised by world wars and modern skepticism. “Flesh” is not a decorative noun there; it’s a rebuttal to the idea that God stays safely above history. The line works because it refuses both sentimentality and abstraction, staking faith on an almost shocking concreteness.
Quote Details
| Topic | God |
|---|
More Quotes by William
Add to List







