"God save us from people who do the morally right thing. It's always the rest of us who get broken in half"

Paddy Chayefsky's quote shows a deep skepticism and review of those who pursue moral absolutism. It challenges the concept that actions thought about ethically righteous are naturally helpful or harmless. Instead, Chayefsky suggests that such actions can typically result in unintentional effects that adversely effect others, highlighting the intricacies and potential threats of stiff moral thinking.

The expression "God conserve us from individuals who do the ethically ideal thing" suggests a sense of paradox or paradox. Individuals who believe they are upholding moral standards may act with a sense of superiority or righteousness, driven by their convictions. Nevertheless, Chayefsky points out that these convictions, while well-intentioned, can be myopic, failing to consider the broader ramifications of their actions on others who might not share the very same worths or scenarios.

The concept that "it's always the rest of us who get broken in half" highlights the effect that such morally-driven choices can have on those not in positions of decision-making power. This images suggests a damaging force, disintegrating communities, relationships, or people who are captured in the crossfire. It shows the concept that moral actions, especially when enacted without compassion or consideration of varied perspectives, can harm those who go through the repercussions without option or agency.

Chayefsky's quote also invites contemplation on the nature of morality itself. It suggests that morality is not always a black-and-white spectrum which the application of moral concepts requires a nuanced understanding and empathy. It works as a care versus zealous moralism that focuses on ideological purity over useful compassion or empathy.

In essence, Chayefsky's words require a more reflective and inclusive technique to morality, promoting for decisions that think about the welfare and dignity of all individuals, instead of sticking strictly to abstract principles that might create division and harm.