"Good art, however "immoral", is wholly a thing of virtue. Good art can NOT be immoral. By good art I mean art that bears true witness, I mean the art that is most precise"
About this Quote
The subtext is a defense brief for modernism’s most combative habits. Pound lived in an era when new forms were routinely pathologized as decadent. His answer: if a poem is “precise” enough to “bear true witness,” it can’t be immoral, because its ethic is embedded in attention itself. That’s a power move, but also a dodge. By redefining morality as fidelity to perception, Pound tries to exempt the artist from the courtroom of public standards and put the critic on the hook: if you’re offended, maybe you’re refusing the evidence.
Context complicates the bravado. Pound’s career is inseparable from his belief that culture should be purified by exacting standards; that belief produced electrifying editing, championing, and formal innovation. It also slid, disastrously, into political fanaticism. Read with that history in mind, “true witness” sounds less like humble reportage and more like a claim to authority: my precision is my innocence.
Still, the line lands because it articulates an enduring temptation in art culture: to treat aesthetic seriousness as an alibi. Pound isn’t just praising craft. He’s trying to make craft morally sovereign.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Verified source: The New Freewoman: The Serious Artist (Ezra Pound, 1913)
Evidence:
And that good art however ‘immoral’ it is, is wholly a thing of virtue. Purely and simply that good art can not be immoral. By good art I mean art that bears true witness, I mean the art that is most precise. (Vol. 1, No. 9, pp. 161-163; continued in No. 10, pp. 194-195; No. 11, pp. 213-214). The quote is from Ezra Pound’s essay series “The Serious Artist,” first published in The New Freewoman in 1913, not originally from a later book. Scholarly bibliographic sources identify the first installment as appearing in The New Freewoman 1.9 on October 15, 1913, with the series continuing in 1.10 on November 1, 1913 and 1.11 on November 15, 1913. The wording commonly circulated online omits the sentence “Purely and simply that good art can not be immoral” and sometimes modernizes capitalization/punctuation. The essay was later reprinted in Pavannes and Divisions (Knopf, 1918) and then in Literary Essays of Ezra Pound (1968). The provided URL points to one issue of the original journal run; the Modernist Journals Project and scholarly references confirm the original periodical publication sequence. |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Pound, Ezra. (2026, March 10). Good art, however "immoral", is wholly a thing of virtue. Good art can NOT be immoral. By good art I mean art that bears true witness, I mean the art that is most precise. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/good-art-however-immoral-is-wholly-a-thing-of-146263/
Chicago Style
Pound, Ezra. "Good art, however "immoral", is wholly a thing of virtue. Good art can NOT be immoral. By good art I mean art that bears true witness, I mean the art that is most precise." FixQuotes. March 10, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/good-art-however-immoral-is-wholly-a-thing-of-146263/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Good art, however "immoral", is wholly a thing of virtue. Good art can NOT be immoral. By good art I mean art that bears true witness, I mean the art that is most precise." FixQuotes, 10 Mar. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/good-art-however-immoral-is-wholly-a-thing-of-146263/. Accessed 24 Mar. 2026.










