"Good sense travels on the well-worn paths; genius, never. And that is why the crowd, not altogether without reason, is so ready to treat great men as lunatics"
About this Quote
Good sense, Lombroso suggests, is basically foot traffic: it moves where the ground has already been flattened by habit, tradition, and social permission. Genius is the trespasser, cutting across the field, ignoring the signage, arriving by routes that look, from a distance, like error. The line works because it turns a social reflex - suspicion of the unconventional - into something almost rational. The crowd isn’t merely petty; it’s defending a map that keeps daily life predictable. In that framing, calling the genius “lunatic” becomes a kind of civic hygiene: a way to quarantine disruptive possibilities before they infect consensus.
The subtext is where Lombroso’s own era gets loud. Writing in the late 19th century, he helped popularize the idea that deviance - criminality, “madness,” even brilliance - could be read as biological fate. His famous (and now discredited) project of pinning genius to pathology sits behind this aphorism like a shadow. He’s not only describing how society misrecognizes innovation; he’s flirting with the claim that extraordinary minds really do border on illness. That’s a seductive story for modernity, which wanted both great artists and neat categories to file them under.
There’s also a sly power move embedded here: the crowd is excused (“not altogether without reason”), while “great men” are romanticized as inherently illegible. Genius gets its aura by being misunderstood; the public gets absolution for misunderstanding it. The quote captures the cultural bargain: we mythologize innovators as mad, then use that myth to keep their ideas safely at arm’s length.
The subtext is where Lombroso’s own era gets loud. Writing in the late 19th century, he helped popularize the idea that deviance - criminality, “madness,” even brilliance - could be read as biological fate. His famous (and now discredited) project of pinning genius to pathology sits behind this aphorism like a shadow. He’s not only describing how society misrecognizes innovation; he’s flirting with the claim that extraordinary minds really do border on illness. That’s a seductive story for modernity, which wanted both great artists and neat categories to file them under.
There’s also a sly power move embedded here: the crowd is excused (“not altogether without reason”), while “great men” are romanticized as inherently illegible. Genius gets its aura by being misunderstood; the public gets absolution for misunderstanding it. The quote captures the cultural bargain: we mythologize innovators as mad, then use that myth to keep their ideas safely at arm’s length.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Cesare
Add to List











