"Government is inherently incompetent, and no matter what task it is assigned, it will do it in the most expensive and inefficient way possible"
About this Quote
There’s a tidy absoluteness to Reese’s line that doubles as its rhetorical trick: if government is "inherently incompetent", then failure isn’t an accident or a corruption of the mission; it’s the mission. The sentence is built like a closed system. "No matter what task" and "will do it" preempt counterexamples, while "most expensive and inefficient way possible" turns critique into inevitability. It’s not an argument so much as a verdict, designed to feel like common sense.
The intent is plainly polemical: shrink the range of what we imagine government can do by framing public administration as structurally doomed. Reese is writing in the long American tradition of anti-bureaucratic populism, where the state is cast as a clumsy, self-feeding machine and the taxpayer is the permanently mugged protagonist. The subtext is distrust not only of programs, but of expertise itself: if the institution is incompetent by nature, then policy details become irrelevant, and reform becomes naive. That’s a convenient posture for pushing privatization, deregulation, or simply resignation.
What makes it work culturally is its emotional economy. Many people have felt the sting of paperwork, delays, opaque rules, and inflated procurement costs; Reese compresses that frustration into a maxim that travels well on talk radio and op-eds. The weakness is the same as the strength: the line collapses "government" into a single actor, ignoring the ways public agencies succeed quietly (water systems, vaccines, aviation safety) and the ways private markets also bloat, fail, and bill. But as a piece of persuasion, it’s engineered to win the vibe war: government as the always-losing manager of everything it touches.
The intent is plainly polemical: shrink the range of what we imagine government can do by framing public administration as structurally doomed. Reese is writing in the long American tradition of anti-bureaucratic populism, where the state is cast as a clumsy, self-feeding machine and the taxpayer is the permanently mugged protagonist. The subtext is distrust not only of programs, but of expertise itself: if the institution is incompetent by nature, then policy details become irrelevant, and reform becomes naive. That’s a convenient posture for pushing privatization, deregulation, or simply resignation.
What makes it work culturally is its emotional economy. Many people have felt the sting of paperwork, delays, opaque rules, and inflated procurement costs; Reese compresses that frustration into a maxim that travels well on talk radio and op-eds. The weakness is the same as the strength: the line collapses "government" into a single actor, ignoring the ways public agencies succeed quietly (water systems, vaccines, aviation safety) and the ways private markets also bloat, fail, and bill. But as a piece of persuasion, it’s engineered to win the vibe war: government as the always-losing manager of everything it touches.
Quote Details
| Topic | Management |
|---|
More Quotes by Charley
Add to List




