"Government lawyers have a duty to disclose evidence of wrongdoing in the government"
About this Quote
Coming from Ken Starr, that line lands like a civics lecture delivered by someone who helped turn civics into blood sport. The sentence is clean, almost antiseptic: “duty,” “disclose,” “wrongdoing.” No qualifiers, no caveats, no hand-wringing about “national security” or “institutional prerogatives.” That spareness is the point. Starr is invoking the most elevated version of the government lawyer: not a hired gun for an administration, but a custodian of the state’s legitimacy. The specific intent is normative and disciplinary, aimed as much at lawyers inside the machine as at the machine itself. He’s drawing a boundary line: your client isn’t the agency head, it’s the public interest.
The subtext, though, is that this duty is routinely resisted - not out of cartoon villainy, but out of career incentives, bureaucratic loyalty, and the quiet power of secrecy. “Wrongdoing in the government” is also deliberately broad, sidestepping the comfortable fiction that misconduct is always individual and never structural. It implies that cover-ups are not aberrations; they’re a predictable feature of governance when oversight gets inconvenient.
Context sharpens the edge. Starr’s public legacy is inseparable from the independent counsel era and the politics of investigation. That makes the quote read as both principle and self-justification: a reminder that aggressive disclosure can be framed as ethical obligation, not partisan warfare. It works because it’s aspirational while sounding procedural - a moral claim disguised as professional housekeeping.
The subtext, though, is that this duty is routinely resisted - not out of cartoon villainy, but out of career incentives, bureaucratic loyalty, and the quiet power of secrecy. “Wrongdoing in the government” is also deliberately broad, sidestepping the comfortable fiction that misconduct is always individual and never structural. It implies that cover-ups are not aberrations; they’re a predictable feature of governance when oversight gets inconvenient.
Context sharpens the edge. Starr’s public legacy is inseparable from the independent counsel era and the politics of investigation. That makes the quote read as both principle and self-justification: a reminder that aggressive disclosure can be framed as ethical obligation, not partisan warfare. It works because it’s aspirational while sounding procedural - a moral claim disguised as professional housekeeping.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Ken
Add to List




