"Greenspan tells us what to do. Someone should take him out and hang him"
About this Quote
It lands like a barroom aside dressed up as political analysis: a flat declaration of authority ("Greenspan tells us what to do") followed by a gleefully disproportionate punishment fantasy ("take him out and hang him"). The whiplash is the point. Gibson isn’t arguing policy so much as auditioning a mood - the resentful thrill of imagining a technocrat made mortal.
Alan Greenspan, as longtime Federal Reserve chair, became a symbol of unelected power: interest rates decided behind closed doors, economic pain explained after the fact in dense jargon, and a public asked to treat it all as weather. Gibson’s line turns that diffuse frustration into a single target, collapsing structural complexity into a villain with a name. It’s populist storytelling: if someone is "telling us what to do", then someone must be "in charge", and if someone is in charge, they can be punished.
The subtext is a conspiracy-tinged suspicion of expertise. "Tells us" implies not advising but commanding; it smuggles in the idea that ordinary people are being managed, not represented. The violence is not a serious prescription so much as a signal flare to allies: I’m so fed up I’ll say the unsayable. That’s how radical talk often works socially - less blueprint than bonding ritual.
Still, the rhetoric is combustible. Lynching language drags political grievance into the register of elimination, not accountability. It doesn’t critique central banking; it performs contempt for the legitimacy of any institution that asks citizens to trust it.
Alan Greenspan, as longtime Federal Reserve chair, became a symbol of unelected power: interest rates decided behind closed doors, economic pain explained after the fact in dense jargon, and a public asked to treat it all as weather. Gibson’s line turns that diffuse frustration into a single target, collapsing structural complexity into a villain with a name. It’s populist storytelling: if someone is "telling us what to do", then someone must be "in charge", and if someone is in charge, they can be punished.
The subtext is a conspiracy-tinged suspicion of expertise. "Tells us" implies not advising but commanding; it smuggles in the idea that ordinary people are being managed, not represented. The violence is not a serious prescription so much as a signal flare to allies: I’m so fed up I’ll say the unsayable. That’s how radical talk often works socially - less blueprint than bonding ritual.
Still, the rhetoric is combustible. Lynching language drags political grievance into the register of elimination, not accountability. It doesn’t critique central banking; it performs contempt for the legitimacy of any institution that asks citizens to trust it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Anger |
|---|
More Quotes by Hutton
Add to List
