"Have you ever tried to split sawdust?"
About this Quote
The intent is surgical. He’s not merely calling something “pointless”; he’s mocking the kind of bureaucratic or rhetorical labor that performs seriousness without producing substance. The subtext is also moral: if you keep trying to split sawdust, you’re either self-deceived or trying to deceive others, manufacturing the appearance of stakes so you can justify meetings, memos, and speeches.
Context matters because McCarthy was a rare breed in American politics: an intellectual with a dry, Midwestern sting, best known for challenging Lyndon Johnson in 1968 from an antiwar position. In that world, where language is routinely used to launder contradictions, the metaphor doubles as media critique and institutional critique. It’s a jab at hair-splitting, yes, but also at a system that grinds complex issues down into talking points and then asks everyone to treat the powder as policy.
What makes it work rhetorically is the question form. “Have you ever tried…?” invites you into an experience you can instantly feel: the absurdity of applying a decisive tool (an axe, a wedge) to something that won’t hold a line. It’s contempt delivered with a smile.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
McCarthy, Eugene. (2026, January 17). Have you ever tried to split sawdust? FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/have-you-ever-tried-to-split-sawdust-54155/
Chicago Style
McCarthy, Eugene. "Have you ever tried to split sawdust?" FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/have-you-ever-tried-to-split-sawdust-54155/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Have you ever tried to split sawdust?" FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/have-you-ever-tried-to-split-sawdust-54155/. Accessed 13 Feb. 2026.





