"He killed his enemies because he was afraid they would kill him. Amin ordered entire tribes to be put to death, because he feared they would rebel"
About this Quote
Violence, in Kapuscinski's framing, isn’t the overflow of confidence; it’s the leak of panic. The line strips Idi Amin’s mass killing of any heroic or even coherent political motive and reduces it to something uglier and more intimate: fear dressed up as statecraft. Kapuscinski’s intent is diagnostic, not just condemnatory. He’s naming a logic that authoritarian regimes rely on but rarely admit: the ruler who cannot tolerate uncertainty converts suspicion into policy, and policy into bodies.
The subtext is about preemption as a moral solvent. If your enemies are always about to strike, then anything you do becomes “self-defense,” even genocide. Kapuscinski pushes that rationalization to its grotesque end by moving from “enemies” to “entire tribes,” showing how paranoia scales. Once fear becomes the engine, categories blur: opponent becomes traitor becomes ethnic group. It’s not only cruelty; it’s an administrative imagination that turns politics into extermination planning.
Context matters: Kapuscinski reported on postcolonial states where power was new, institutions brittle, and external pressures constant. Amin’s Uganda, riven by military factionalism and ethnic patronage, offered real threats to a ruler who seized power by force. Kapuscinski doesn’t deny that; he weaponizes it. The fear may be understandable, but the response is revealing. A leader’s insecurity becomes everyone else’s emergency, and “rebellion” becomes a convenient label for any community that might someday refuse to kneel.
The subtext is about preemption as a moral solvent. If your enemies are always about to strike, then anything you do becomes “self-defense,” even genocide. Kapuscinski pushes that rationalization to its grotesque end by moving from “enemies” to “entire tribes,” showing how paranoia scales. Once fear becomes the engine, categories blur: opponent becomes traitor becomes ethnic group. It’s not only cruelty; it’s an administrative imagination that turns politics into extermination planning.
Context matters: Kapuscinski reported on postcolonial states where power was new, institutions brittle, and external pressures constant. Amin’s Uganda, riven by military factionalism and ethnic patronage, offered real threats to a ruler who seized power by force. Kapuscinski doesn’t deny that; he weaponizes it. The fear may be understandable, but the response is revealing. A leader’s insecurity becomes everyone else’s emergency, and “rebellion” becomes a convenient label for any community that might someday refuse to kneel.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Ryszard
Add to List



