"Health is certainly extremely important, and we've done a number of things at Facebook to help improve global health and work in that area, and I am excited to do more there, too. But the reality is that it's not an either-or. People need to be healthy and be able to have the Internet as a backbone to connect them to the whole economy"
About this Quote
Zuckerberg is doing a familiar bit of Silicon Valley aikido: taking a moral critique (why build social platforms when people lack basic healthcare?) and flipping it into a systems argument where his product becomes part of the cure. The line starts with dutiful empathy, name-checking “global health” to signal he’s not indifferent. Then comes the pivot word that matters: “But.” From there, the framing tightens into managerial inevitability: “the reality is” isn’t a claim so much as an attempt to close debate.
The subtext is defensive and expansionist at the same time. By insisting it’s “not an either-or,” he rejects the premise that resources, attention, and political will are finite. That’s convenient for a company often accused of absorbing those very things. Health and internet access become parallel “needs,” which quietly elevates connectivity to the status of a basic utility - not a luxury, not a consumer choice, and certainly not a corporate strategy.
The key metaphor - “Internet as a backbone” - does rhetorical heavy lifting. Backbones are foundational, non-negotiable, biologically necessary. In one phrase, the internet stops being a service Facebook profits from and starts being infrastructure society can’t function without. “Connect them to the whole economy” reveals the ideology under the benevolence: the goal isn’t merely information or community; it’s participation in markets. Contextually, this sits in the era of Facebook’s connectivity initiatives and reputation battles, a polished argument for why building the pipes (and controlling the on-ramps) is framed as public good rather than private power.
The subtext is defensive and expansionist at the same time. By insisting it’s “not an either-or,” he rejects the premise that resources, attention, and political will are finite. That’s convenient for a company often accused of absorbing those very things. Health and internet access become parallel “needs,” which quietly elevates connectivity to the status of a basic utility - not a luxury, not a consumer choice, and certainly not a corporate strategy.
The key metaphor - “Internet as a backbone” - does rhetorical heavy lifting. Backbones are foundational, non-negotiable, biologically necessary. In one phrase, the internet stops being a service Facebook profits from and starts being infrastructure society can’t function without. “Connect them to the whole economy” reveals the ideology under the benevolence: the goal isn’t merely information or community; it’s participation in markets. Contextually, this sits in the era of Facebook’s connectivity initiatives and reputation battles, a polished argument for why building the pipes (and controlling the on-ramps) is framed as public good rather than private power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Mark
Add to List


