"Hence, wherever we meet with vital phenomena that present the two aspects, physical and psychical there naturally arises a question as to the relations in which these aspects stand to each other"
About this Quote
Wundt is doing something slyly radical in the calm, administrative language of a lab founder: he’s insisting that the moment you take “vital phenomena” seriously, you inherit a two-front war. The physical and the psychical don’t merely coexist; their co-presence generates an obligation to ask how they connect. That word “naturally” is doing heavy lifting. He’s framing the mind-body problem not as a metaphysical hobbyhorse but as the inevitable next step for anyone claiming to study life scientifically.
Context matters. In late-19th-century Europe, psychology is trying to become a discipline with instruments, measurements, and institutional legitimacy. Wundt, often branded the father of experimental psychology, wants a field that can speak the language of physiology without being swallowed by it. So he sets up a careful symmetry: “two aspects” rather than two substances, a rhetorical move that dodges crude materialism on one side and free-floating spiritualism on the other. It reads like diplomacy, but the intent is jurisdiction.
The subtext is a boundary dispute with bigger neighbors. If mental life is always paired with bodily processes, then psychology can justify experiments, reaction times, sensory thresholds. If it is an “aspect” with its own descriptive terms, then it also resists being reduced to nerve firings alone. Wundt’s sentence is the blueprint for psychology’s enduring compromise: be empirical, but don’t surrender the inner life; quantify what you can, but keep a vocabulary for experience.
Context matters. In late-19th-century Europe, psychology is trying to become a discipline with instruments, measurements, and institutional legitimacy. Wundt, often branded the father of experimental psychology, wants a field that can speak the language of physiology without being swallowed by it. So he sets up a careful symmetry: “two aspects” rather than two substances, a rhetorical move that dodges crude materialism on one side and free-floating spiritualism on the other. It reads like diplomacy, but the intent is jurisdiction.
The subtext is a boundary dispute with bigger neighbors. If mental life is always paired with bodily processes, then psychology can justify experiments, reaction times, sensory thresholds. If it is an “aspect” with its own descriptive terms, then it also resists being reduced to nerve firings alone. Wundt’s sentence is the blueprint for psychology’s enduring compromise: be empirical, but don’t surrender the inner life; quantify what you can, but keep a vocabulary for experience.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Wilhelm
Add to List
