"Here, also, has been evolved the form of government consistent with the largest possible civil liberty"
About this Quote
“Evolved” is doing the sly work here. Josiah Strong isn’t just praising a particular constitution; he’s laundering a political preference through the language of inevitability. In the late 19th century, evolution-talk had escaped the lab and become a cultural solvent: if something has “evolved,” it sounds natural, efficient, and beyond ordinary dispute. Strong borrows that prestige to frame an American-style government not as a choice among flawed options, but as the endpoint of historical development.
The phrase “consistent with the largest possible civil liberty” is equally strategic. “Largest possible” signals confidence while quietly dodging specifics: liberty for whom, and at what cost? Strong wrote in an era when “civil liberty” was often invoked alongside anxieties about immigration, urbanization, labor unrest, and the expanding claims of Black Americans after Reconstruction. The subtext is that liberty is both a moral achievement and a managed commodity, best administered by the right people under the right cultural (read: Protestant, Anglo-American) assumptions.
As a clergyman, Strong’s intent isn’t merely political; it’s providential. He’s stitching governance to moral destiny, implying that American institutions harmonize with God’s design for freedom. That move elevates policy into mission: if the system is the most liberty-compatible form available, exporting it (or defending it against “inferior” alternatives) starts to look less like power and more like duty.
The line works because it flatters the reader into consent while smuggling in hierarchy: liberty, yes, but calibrated, curated, and ultimately certified by history itself.
The phrase “consistent with the largest possible civil liberty” is equally strategic. “Largest possible” signals confidence while quietly dodging specifics: liberty for whom, and at what cost? Strong wrote in an era when “civil liberty” was often invoked alongside anxieties about immigration, urbanization, labor unrest, and the expanding claims of Black Americans after Reconstruction. The subtext is that liberty is both a moral achievement and a managed commodity, best administered by the right people under the right cultural (read: Protestant, Anglo-American) assumptions.
As a clergyman, Strong’s intent isn’t merely political; it’s providential. He’s stitching governance to moral destiny, implying that American institutions harmonize with God’s design for freedom. That move elevates policy into mission: if the system is the most liberty-compatible form available, exporting it (or defending it against “inferior” alternatives) starts to look less like power and more like duty.
The line works because it flatters the reader into consent while smuggling in hierarchy: liberty, yes, but calibrated, curated, and ultimately certified by history itself.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Josiah
Add to List











