"Here, we tell the story: why the people came here, what they did when they got here, going back to the Native Americans and coming all the way forward"
About this Quote
History, in Robert Patterson's framing, isn't a parade of dates; it's a recruitment pitch for empathy. The line opens with "Here", a small word that plants a flag: this is a place with an official memory, a curated narrative, a public-facing identity. "We tell the story" sounds communal and democratic, but it also quietly names gatekeepers. Someone is choosing the arc, deciding which "why" counts and which "what" becomes footnote.
The sentence structure signals a museum-or-documentary sensibility: origin, arrival, action. "Why the people came here" centers motive, the kind of explanatory logic that can soften messy realities into understandable journeys. It's an inviting frame for immigrants and settlers alike, but it risks turning displacement and conquest into a neutral "came here" - passive voice without the grammar. Then comes the corrective (or at least the attempt): "going back to the Native Americans". That phrase performs inclusivity while revealing how often Indigenous history gets treated as the prologue rather than the ongoing plot. "Going back" implies a rewind, not a continuous presence; "coming all the way forward" suggests progress, a timeline that inevitably ends at us.
Patterson's intent feels earnest: stitch together a long, continuous account that resists amnesia. The subtext is the cultural fight over who gets to be the starting point of "America", and whether the national story is a straight line toward modernity or a knot of competing sovereignties. The quote works because it compresses a whole institutional ambition - to look comprehensive - while exposing, in its phrasing, how hard true comprehensiveness is.
The sentence structure signals a museum-or-documentary sensibility: origin, arrival, action. "Why the people came here" centers motive, the kind of explanatory logic that can soften messy realities into understandable journeys. It's an inviting frame for immigrants and settlers alike, but it risks turning displacement and conquest into a neutral "came here" - passive voice without the grammar. Then comes the corrective (or at least the attempt): "going back to the Native Americans". That phrase performs inclusivity while revealing how often Indigenous history gets treated as the prologue rather than the ongoing plot. "Going back" implies a rewind, not a continuous presence; "coming all the way forward" suggests progress, a timeline that inevitably ends at us.
Patterson's intent feels earnest: stitch together a long, continuous account that resists amnesia. The subtext is the cultural fight over who gets to be the starting point of "America", and whether the national story is a straight line toward modernity or a knot of competing sovereignties. The quote works because it compresses a whole institutional ambition - to look comprehensive - while exposing, in its phrasing, how hard true comprehensiveness is.
Quote Details
| Topic | Legacy & Remembrance |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List



