"Here's the problem if you keep raising tax rates: You slow down economic growth"
About this Quote
Paul Ryan’s line is built to sound like common sense, not ideology: a clean cause-and-effect chain that turns a messy fiscal argument into a speed limit sign. “Here’s the problem” frames him as the adult in the room, the person spotting the obvious snag everyone else is supposedly ignoring. “If you keep raising tax rates” casts the other side as compulsive and irresponsible; it’s not one targeted increase, it’s a habit. Then he lands the payoff: “You slow down economic growth” - a phrase that carries moral and political weight in Washington because “growth” is treated less like a metric than a national mood.
The subtext is coalition management. Ryan is speaking to business interests, deficit hawks, and middle-class voters anxious about stagnation, offering a single villain: taxes. It’s a tidy way to oppose redistribution without arguing about redistribution. Notice what’s missing: which taxes, on whom, at what point in the business cycle, paired with what spending. The ambiguity is strategic; it lets corporate rates, capital gains, and high-end income taxes all ride under one warning label.
Context matters: Ryan’s brand has long fused supply-side assumptions with a budget-balancing aesthetic. After the Great Recession and during recurring fights over Obama-era taxes and spending, “growth” became the catch-all justification for refusing revenue increases while favoring spending restraint. The rhetoric works because it shifts debate from fairness to fear: not “is this tax just?” but “will this tax shrink the pie?” Once that frame sticks, anyone advocating higher taxes is cast as choosing decline.
The subtext is coalition management. Ryan is speaking to business interests, deficit hawks, and middle-class voters anxious about stagnation, offering a single villain: taxes. It’s a tidy way to oppose redistribution without arguing about redistribution. Notice what’s missing: which taxes, on whom, at what point in the business cycle, paired with what spending. The ambiguity is strategic; it lets corporate rates, capital gains, and high-end income taxes all ride under one warning label.
Context matters: Ryan’s brand has long fused supply-side assumptions with a budget-balancing aesthetic. After the Great Recession and during recurring fights over Obama-era taxes and spending, “growth” became the catch-all justification for refusing revenue increases while favoring spending restraint. The rhetoric works because it shifts debate from fairness to fear: not “is this tax just?” but “will this tax shrink the pie?” Once that frame sticks, anyone advocating higher taxes is cast as choosing decline.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List


