"History could pass for a scarlet text, its jot and title graven red in human blood"
About this Quote
History, in Eldridge Cleaver's hands, isn't a dignified ledger or a neutral archive. It's a scarlet text: holy-seeming, endlessly cited, and written in a color that won't wash out. The phrase borrows the cadence of scripture ("jot and title") to mock the way power treats the past as gospel, then stains that reverence with the actual ink of politics: blood. Cleaver turns the pious idea of "learning from history" into an accusation. If history is a text, it isn't authored by detached narrators; it's carved into bodies.
The intent is confrontational. Cleaver, writing out of the Black radical tradition of the 1960s and early 1970s, rejects the comforting American habit of treating violence as an unfortunate detour on the road to progress. "Graven" suggests inscription on stone, permanence, a kind of bureaucratic brutality: these aren't incidental tragedies, they're foundational clauses. The subtext is that the nation (and the West more broadly) canonizes its own wounds selectively, memorializing some suffering while normalizing or erasing the suffering that made its institutions possible.
The line also does something rhetorically sly. By echoing biblical precision, Cleaver implies that oppression has its own meticulous record-keeping, down to the smallest marks. The "scarlet" isn't just gore; it's shame and spectacle, the color of stigma and state violence alike. History, he suggests, isn't merely remembered. It's enforced, and the cost is legible in red.
The intent is confrontational. Cleaver, writing out of the Black radical tradition of the 1960s and early 1970s, rejects the comforting American habit of treating violence as an unfortunate detour on the road to progress. "Graven" suggests inscription on stone, permanence, a kind of bureaucratic brutality: these aren't incidental tragedies, they're foundational clauses. The subtext is that the nation (and the West more broadly) canonizes its own wounds selectively, memorializing some suffering while normalizing or erasing the suffering that made its institutions possible.
The line also does something rhetorically sly. By echoing biblical precision, Cleaver implies that oppression has its own meticulous record-keeping, down to the smallest marks. The "scarlet" isn't just gore; it's shame and spectacle, the color of stigma and state violence alike. History, he suggests, isn't merely remembered. It's enforced, and the cost is legible in red.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Eldridge
Add to List







