"History shows that no enemy remains hostile forever, nor do friends remain friendly forever. For that reason, we intend to have normal relations with all"
About this Quote
The line lands like a diplomatic shrug with teeth: permanence is a fairy tale, so policy should be built for volatility. Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa is not offering a moral lesson about forgiveness; he is selling strategic flexibility as realism. By flattening enemies and friends into temporary conditions, he frames allegiance as weather, not destiny. That matters coming from a Gulf monarch whose security has long depended on shifting guarantees, regional rivalries, and the constant recalculation of who counts as a partner.
The wording does a careful double move. First, it demystifies hostility and friendship, stripping both of sentiment. That’s the subtext: states don’t have relationships, they have interests. Second, it turns that cold premise into a forward-looking mandate - “for that reason, we intend” - which sounds conciliatory while preserving leverage. “Normal relations” is the key euphemism: it promises dialogue without specifying concessions, timelines, or red lines. Normal with whom? On what terms? The ambiguity is the point. It leaves room to court adversaries, reassure allies, and hedge against both.
In context, this kind of language often functions as permission structure. It signals to domestic audiences and regional counterparts that contact with a former foe isn’t betrayal; it’s history’s lesson, applied. It also hints at a subtle warning to friends: loyalty is conditional, so keep investing. The quote works because it presents opportunism as prudence, and prudence as inevitability.
The wording does a careful double move. First, it demystifies hostility and friendship, stripping both of sentiment. That’s the subtext: states don’t have relationships, they have interests. Second, it turns that cold premise into a forward-looking mandate - “for that reason, we intend” - which sounds conciliatory while preserving leverage. “Normal relations” is the key euphemism: it promises dialogue without specifying concessions, timelines, or red lines. Normal with whom? On what terms? The ambiguity is the point. It leaves room to court adversaries, reassure allies, and hedge against both.
In context, this kind of language often functions as permission structure. It signals to domestic audiences and regional counterparts that contact with a former foe isn’t betrayal; it’s history’s lesson, applied. It also hints at a subtle warning to friends: loyalty is conditional, so keep investing. The quote works because it presents opportunism as prudence, and prudence as inevitability.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Hamad
Add to List








