"Honesty, integrity, and accountability, the values, which should be the hallmark of this government, have instead been thrown under the bus by an arrogant majority, casualties in a misguided campaign to shield from accountability those who abuse this House"
About this Quote
There’s a deliberate bruising physicality to Slaughter’s language: values aren’t merely ignored, they’re “thrown under the bus,” a phrase that drags lofty civic ideals into the realm of blunt, televised betrayal. The intent is prosecutorial. She’s not arguing policy; she’s indicting a power structure and daring the audience to see process as moral theater. “Honesty, integrity, and accountability” arrives in a tight triplet, the kind of rhythm politicians use to sound like bedrock. Then she flips it: those virtues are recast as “casualties,” implying a battlefield where the majority’s real project isn’t governance but protection.
The subtext is that corruption doesn’t usually announce itself as corruption; it poses as strategy. Her phrase “misguided campaign” is an accusation with an escape hatch: it suggests either cynical cover-up or ideological blindness, letting listeners choose their villain while keeping the charge intact. “Arrogant majority” sharpens the target. This isn’t bipartisan fog. It’s a critique of what happens when one party’s control hardens into impunity, when the rules of the House become a shield rather than a check.
Contextually, this is the House as an institution talking about itself, which is why the wording matters. “Those who abuse this House” frames misconduct not as a private failing but as an attack on the chamber’s legitimacy. Slaughter’s deeper move is to warn that procedural maneuvers - closed hearings, weak ethics enforcement, party-line protection - don’t just manage scandal; they erode the idea that democratic institutions can police their own.
The subtext is that corruption doesn’t usually announce itself as corruption; it poses as strategy. Her phrase “misguided campaign” is an accusation with an escape hatch: it suggests either cynical cover-up or ideological blindness, letting listeners choose their villain while keeping the charge intact. “Arrogant majority” sharpens the target. This isn’t bipartisan fog. It’s a critique of what happens when one party’s control hardens into impunity, when the rules of the House become a shield rather than a check.
Contextually, this is the House as an institution talking about itself, which is why the wording matters. “Those who abuse this House” frames misconduct not as a private failing but as an attack on the chamber’s legitimacy. Slaughter’s deeper move is to warn that procedural maneuvers - closed hearings, weak ethics enforcement, party-line protection - don’t just manage scandal; they erode the idea that democratic institutions can police their own.
Quote Details
| Topic | Honesty & Integrity |
|---|
More Quotes by Louise
Add to List






