"How do I explain Neil Young? Great question! I explain Neil Young as, I would kill to see his acoustic shows"
About this Quote
Neil Young is the kind of artist who breaks the usual critical machinery, and Bob Mould knows it. Asked to "explain" Young, Mould swerves past biography, genre, legacy, even taste-making. He answers with desire: "I would kill to see his acoustic shows". The pivot is the point. Young isn’t a résumé you summarize; he’s an experience you chase.
As a fellow lifer in guitar-driven music, Mould is also quietly rejecting the idea that influence can be captured in tidy lineage charts. Young’s acoustic sets are where the mythology concentrates: the creak of a voice, the blunt poetry, the sense that the song is happening in real time rather than being delivered as product. Mould’s hyperbole ("kill") isn’t about violence; it’s a musician’s shorthand for scarcity and sanctity. Acoustic Neil implies intimacy, vulnerability, a stripping away of the distortion that people often associate with Young’s harder edges. It’s the version of Young that feels most unmediated, and therefore most unrepeatable.
There’s also a subtle critique of how we talk about icons. The question presumes Neil Young needs translating for an audience, as if he’s a concept. Mould responds like a fan, not a curator, insisting that the truest explanation is embodied: show up, listen, be changed. In a culture addicted to takes and rankings, it’s an insistence that reverence can be perfectly articulate when it’s rooted in hunger.
As a fellow lifer in guitar-driven music, Mould is also quietly rejecting the idea that influence can be captured in tidy lineage charts. Young’s acoustic sets are where the mythology concentrates: the creak of a voice, the blunt poetry, the sense that the song is happening in real time rather than being delivered as product. Mould’s hyperbole ("kill") isn’t about violence; it’s a musician’s shorthand for scarcity and sanctity. Acoustic Neil implies intimacy, vulnerability, a stripping away of the distortion that people often associate with Young’s harder edges. It’s the version of Young that feels most unmediated, and therefore most unrepeatable.
There’s also a subtle critique of how we talk about icons. The question presumes Neil Young needs translating for an audience, as if he’s a concept. Mould responds like a fan, not a curator, insisting that the truest explanation is embodied: show up, listen, be changed. In a culture addicted to takes and rankings, it’s an insistence that reverence can be perfectly articulate when it’s rooted in hunger.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|
More Quotes by Bob
Add to List
