"How do you keep war accountable to the American people when war becomes invisible and virtual?"
About this Quote
A war you can’t see is a war you don’t have to feel - and that’s the trap Ignatieff is laying bare. His question isn’t logistical; it’s democratic. Accountability in a republic depends on friction: bodies returning home, budgets that bite, public arguments that cost leaders something. “Invisible and virtual” names the modern way of sanding down that friction through drones, special operations, classified programs, and a media environment that treats distant violence as intermittent content rather than a civic crisis.
The intent is to indict a political technology as much as a military one. When the battlefield is a screen and the casualties are largely “over there,” the public’s role shrinks from sovereign to spectator. Ignatieff’s subtext is that oversight fails not just because officials lie or institutions are weak, but because citizens are structurally discouraged from paying attention. Virtualized war is politically convenient: it promises precision, low domestic risk, and minimal disruption to everyday life, turning conflict into a background service the state provides.
Context matters: Ignatieff is writing in the long shadow of post-9/11 warfare, where interventions metastasized into counterterrorism campaigns with vague endpoints. The question also carries a quiet warning about consent. If war no longer requires broad mobilization, leaders can wage it with a thinner mandate, laundering violence through secrecy and technology. The rhetorical force is its simplicity: “keep war accountable” presumes war naturally slips away from scrutiny. His line asks whether democracy can survive wars fought like software updates - continuous, remote, and easy to ignore until the damage is irreversible.
The intent is to indict a political technology as much as a military one. When the battlefield is a screen and the casualties are largely “over there,” the public’s role shrinks from sovereign to spectator. Ignatieff’s subtext is that oversight fails not just because officials lie or institutions are weak, but because citizens are structurally discouraged from paying attention. Virtualized war is politically convenient: it promises precision, low domestic risk, and minimal disruption to everyday life, turning conflict into a background service the state provides.
Context matters: Ignatieff is writing in the long shadow of post-9/11 warfare, where interventions metastasized into counterterrorism campaigns with vague endpoints. The question also carries a quiet warning about consent. If war no longer requires broad mobilization, leaders can wage it with a thinner mandate, laundering violence through secrecy and technology. The rhetorical force is its simplicity: “keep war accountable” presumes war naturally slips away from scrutiny. His line asks whether democracy can survive wars fought like software updates - continuous, remote, and easy to ignore until the damage is irreversible.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List
