"However, I keep reminding them that this issue is not a new issue that has come out for this election. This issue has been in the courts for two years and two months now"
About this Quote
The tell is in the stopwatch precision: "two years and two months". Edmonds isn't just dating the controversy; she's indicting the media-politics reflex that treats long-running legal fights like seasonal plot twists. By opening with "However", she positions herself against an implied chorus of people trying to frame the matter as election-minted drama. Her specific intent is reputational triage: to deny the charge of opportunism and re-anchor the story in a paper trail, not a campaign calendar.
The subtext is sharper than the sentence looks. "I keep reminding them" casts her as someone stuck repeating basic facts to gatekeepers who would rather chase a headline than sit with procedural reality. "This issue" stays pointedly vague, suggesting either legal constraints (ongoing litigation, confidentiality) or a strategic refusal to amplify sensational details. In public-service speech, vagueness can be armor; it signals seriousness without feeding the spectacle.
Context matters because court timelines are the opposite of election timelines. Courts move slowly; campaigns weaponize speed. Edmonds is trying to sever that parasitic link. If it's been "in the courts", it's been subject to evidence, motions, and institutional friction - not just partisan spin. The phrase "for this election" also hints at how dissent gets dismissed: if it surfaces near voting day, it's presumed to be propaganda. Edmonds flips that presumption. The message: if you're only noticing now, that's not proof it's manufactured; it's proof you've been ignoring it.
The subtext is sharper than the sentence looks. "I keep reminding them" casts her as someone stuck repeating basic facts to gatekeepers who would rather chase a headline than sit with procedural reality. "This issue" stays pointedly vague, suggesting either legal constraints (ongoing litigation, confidentiality) or a strategic refusal to amplify sensational details. In public-service speech, vagueness can be armor; it signals seriousness without feeding the spectacle.
Context matters because court timelines are the opposite of election timelines. Courts move slowly; campaigns weaponize speed. Edmonds is trying to sever that parasitic link. If it's been "in the courts", it's been subject to evidence, motions, and institutional friction - not just partisan spin. The phrase "for this election" also hints at how dissent gets dismissed: if it surfaces near voting day, it's presumed to be propaganda. Edmonds flips that presumption. The message: if you're only noticing now, that's not proof it's manufactured; it's proof you've been ignoring it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Sibel
Add to List
