"However painful the process of leaving home, for parents and for children, the really frightening thing for both would be the prospect of the child never leaving home"
About this Quote
Bellah sneaks a cultural indictment into what looks like a gentle observation about growing up. The line pivots on a swap: leaving home is “painful,” yes, but the truly “frightening” scenario is not separation; it’s permanent attachment. That reversal matters. It reframes the drama of adolescence and early adulthood not as a tragedy of loss but as a necessary risk society demands if it wants functional adults.
As a sociologist, Bellah is alert to how private feelings get recruited into public norms. “For parents and for children” isn’t just empathy; it’s a reminder that both sides participate in the same social script. Parents aren’t merely grieving; they’re also being asked to authorize independence. Children aren’t merely rebelling; they’re performing a culturally sanctioned exit. The subtext is that a home that cannot be left has stopped being a launchpad and become an enclosure.
Contextually, this sits neatly beside Bellah’s broader concern with American individualism and the institutions that supposedly cultivate it. The fear he names isn’t just psychological (a stunted child, a clingy parent). It’s civic: a society that can’t reproduce autonomy, responsibility, and adult belonging beyond the family. The quote also anticipates a modern anxiety: when economic precarity, overprotective parenting, or a hollowed-out public sphere make “leaving” harder, the family becomes the default welfare state. Bellah’s point is bracing because it insists that the ache of separation is evidence of health; the absence of it signals something deeper has gone wrong.
As a sociologist, Bellah is alert to how private feelings get recruited into public norms. “For parents and for children” isn’t just empathy; it’s a reminder that both sides participate in the same social script. Parents aren’t merely grieving; they’re also being asked to authorize independence. Children aren’t merely rebelling; they’re performing a culturally sanctioned exit. The subtext is that a home that cannot be left has stopped being a launchpad and become an enclosure.
Contextually, this sits neatly beside Bellah’s broader concern with American individualism and the institutions that supposedly cultivate it. The fear he names isn’t just psychological (a stunted child, a clingy parent). It’s civic: a society that can’t reproduce autonomy, responsibility, and adult belonging beyond the family. The quote also anticipates a modern anxiety: when economic precarity, overprotective parenting, or a hollowed-out public sphere make “leaving” harder, the family becomes the default welfare state. Bellah’s point is bracing because it insists that the ache of separation is evidence of health; the absence of it signals something deeper has gone wrong.
Quote Details
| Topic | Parenting |
|---|---|
| Source | Attributed to Robert N. Bellah in Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life (1985). |
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List




