"However, the Department of Defense treats these detainees in accord with the Geneva Convention, even though that is not required because of the inhumane methods used by these killers"

The quote by Bill Shuster speaks to the treatment of detainees by the Department of Defense, specifically highlighting adherence to the Geneva Convention guidelines. Let's break down the aspects of this declaration and check out the implications.

1. ** Adherence to the Geneva Convention **: The Geneva Conventions are a set of international treaties that develop requirements for humanitarian treatment in war. Shuster discusses that detainees are treated in accordance with these requirements. This suggests a dedication to promoting specific humanitarian concepts, such as humane treatment of prisoners, regardless of the circumstances under which they were caught or their actions prior to detainment.

2. **"Even though that is not needed"**: This phrase recommends that, in Shuster's view, the Department of Defense is not obligated to follow these conventions with these particular detainees. This might be translated as an assertion that these people fall outside the normal classifications covered by the Geneva Conventions, possibly due to their status as non-state actors, terrorists, or combatants not affiliated with a recognized state.

3. **"Because of the inhumane techniques utilized by these killers"**: This portion of the quote supplies insight into Shuster's point of view on the detainees, identifying them as "killers" and accusing them of using "inhumane approaches". This language is emotionally charged and seems to justify, in Shuster's eyes, a potentially solidified method to their capture and treatment. However, despite this, the Department of Defense is still sticking to worldwide humanitarian standards.

Analyzing this quote reveals a stress in between retributive justice and adherence to international norms. It highlights an ethical and ethical argument: whether to deal with all detainees with a baseline of mankind, as recommended by international law, or to create exceptions based upon the seriousness or nature of the detainees' supposed actions. Shuster's declaration highlights a circumstances where the U.S. selects to uphold global standards, which might be viewed either as keeping moral high ground or as needlessly using protections to those who do not reciprocate such requirements.