"I always felt that the Cubans were being pushed into the Soviet Bloc by American policy"
About this Quote
Oswald’s line has the telltale cadence of a man trying to sound like history is on his side. “I always felt” is doing quiet work: it frames his view as settled conviction, not impulse, and invites the listener to treat him as an analyst rather than a zealot. Then he shifts agency away from Cuba. The Cubans aren’t choosing the Soviet Bloc; they’re “being pushed” there, as if geopolitics were a hallway and Washington kept shoving. It’s a moral alibi disguised as foreign-policy critique.
The intent is less to diagnose Cuba than to prosecute America. In one sentence, Oswald sketches a cause-and-effect chain that turns U.S. pressure into the midwife of communist alignment. That’s a familiar Cold War argument on the left, but coming from a “criminal” figure, it doubles as self-justification: if American policy manufactures enemies, then acts taken in solidarity with those enemies can be cast as reaction, even necessity.
The subtext is a craving for significance. Oswald positions himself as someone who saw the board clearly while others stumbled into catastrophe. It’s also a bid for ideological respectability: he’s not merely attracted to the Soviet project; he’s responding to American blundering.
Context matters. After the Cuban Revolution, U.S. hostility escalated quickly: embargoes, covert action, and the Bay of Pigs helped lock Havana into dependence on Moscow. Oswald’s phrasing neatly launders that messy sequence into a single, blame-forward narrative. It’s the rhetoric of inevitability, useful for anyone who wants to trade personal culpability for historical “logic.”
The intent is less to diagnose Cuba than to prosecute America. In one sentence, Oswald sketches a cause-and-effect chain that turns U.S. pressure into the midwife of communist alignment. That’s a familiar Cold War argument on the left, but coming from a “criminal” figure, it doubles as self-justification: if American policy manufactures enemies, then acts taken in solidarity with those enemies can be cast as reaction, even necessity.
The subtext is a craving for significance. Oswald positions himself as someone who saw the board clearly while others stumbled into catastrophe. It’s also a bid for ideological respectability: he’s not merely attracted to the Soviet project; he’s responding to American blundering.
Context matters. After the Cuban Revolution, U.S. hostility escalated quickly: embargoes, covert action, and the Bay of Pigs helped lock Havana into dependence on Moscow. Oswald’s phrasing neatly launders that messy sequence into a single, blame-forward narrative. It’s the rhetoric of inevitability, useful for anyone who wants to trade personal culpability for historical “logic.”
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Lee
Add to List


