"I always look at films as real stories with real people in real situations. That's why I struggle with the whole notion of calling someone the 'good guy' or the 'bad guy,' because I think we all have potential to do good things and all have the potential to do bad things"
About this Quote
Pearce is quietly pushing back against the moral cartooning that movies often encourage: the audience’s desire to sort characters into clean bins so we know who to root for without doing any work. By insisting on “real stories with real people,” he’s not making a naive realism claim so much as staking out an actor’s ethic: treat every role as lived-in, internally coherent, and therefore defensible from the inside. The repeated “real” isn’t redundant; it’s a small hammering rhythm that rejects the genre shortcut where motivation becomes a costume.
The subtext is craft, but also ideology. Calling someone a “bad guy” is a way of stopping curiosity. It turns behavior into essence, and essence into permission: once a person is branded, anything done to them feels justified. Pearce’s line about “potential” reverses that. It frames morality as situational, elastic, and dangerously available to everyone, including the viewer. That’s uncomfortable, which is why it’s effective. It doesn’t flatter us with distance from wrongdoing; it implicates.
Contextually, Pearce’s filmography makes the stance feel earned rather than aspirational. In movies like Memento, L.A. Confidential, and The Proposition, characters are defined by mixed motives and compromised choices, not purity. His point isn’t that there are no villains; it’s that villainy is usually a story we tell after the fact to make chaos legible. The intent is to keep the camera - and the audience - from reaching for the easy label before we’ve watched the human being.
The subtext is craft, but also ideology. Calling someone a “bad guy” is a way of stopping curiosity. It turns behavior into essence, and essence into permission: once a person is branded, anything done to them feels justified. Pearce’s line about “potential” reverses that. It frames morality as situational, elastic, and dangerously available to everyone, including the viewer. That’s uncomfortable, which is why it’s effective. It doesn’t flatter us with distance from wrongdoing; it implicates.
Contextually, Pearce’s filmography makes the stance feel earned rather than aspirational. In movies like Memento, L.A. Confidential, and The Proposition, characters are defined by mixed motives and compromised choices, not purity. His point isn’t that there are no villains; it’s that villainy is usually a story we tell after the fact to make chaos legible. The intent is to keep the camera - and the audience - from reaching for the easy label before we’ve watched the human being.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Guy
Add to List


