"I am a serial killer. I would kill again"
About this Quote
Aileen Wuornos’s blunt confession lands less like a flourish than a weapon: “I am a serial killer. I would kill again.” The first sentence is an identity claim, not a description. By naming herself in the most socially radioactive terms, she seizes authorship of the story that courts, media, and psychologists were already telling for her. It’s a refusal to be framed as an aberration to be “explained” away; it’s the hardest label available, self-applied.
The second sentence is where the intent sharpens. “I would kill again” isn’t just threat; it’s leverage. It dares the system to treat her as permanently dangerous, irredeemable, beyond rehabilitation. Read in the context of her trials and the sensational coverage around a rare woman serial killer, the line performs a kind of scorched-earth clarity: if you’re going to turn me into a monster, I’ll speak in the monster’s voice and deny you the comfort of tidy remorse. It also functions as a preemptive strike against pity, which can feel like another form of control.
The subtext is survival logic hardened into fatalism. Wuornos’s life was marked by violence, poverty, and exploitation; her defenders emphasized self-defense, her prosecutors emphasized predation. This quote collapses that contested terrain into a single, absolute stance. Whether it was truth, bravado, or despair, it works because it rejects the audience’s favorite ending: the repentant criminal. Instead it offers the system its own mirror, reflecting how punishment culture craves certainty more than understanding.
The second sentence is where the intent sharpens. “I would kill again” isn’t just threat; it’s leverage. It dares the system to treat her as permanently dangerous, irredeemable, beyond rehabilitation. Read in the context of her trials and the sensational coverage around a rare woman serial killer, the line performs a kind of scorched-earth clarity: if you’re going to turn me into a monster, I’ll speak in the monster’s voice and deny you the comfort of tidy remorse. It also functions as a preemptive strike against pity, which can feel like another form of control.
The subtext is survival logic hardened into fatalism. Wuornos’s life was marked by violence, poverty, and exploitation; her defenders emphasized self-defense, her prosecutors emphasized predation. This quote collapses that contested terrain into a single, absolute stance. Whether it was truth, bravado, or despair, it works because it rejects the audience’s favorite ending: the repentant criminal. Instead it offers the system its own mirror, reflecting how punishment culture craves certainty more than understanding.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Aileen
Add to List




