"I am against intervention by a foreign power against us"
About this Quote
It reads like a simple declaration of sovereignty, but the real work of Moshe Sharett's line is how carefully it narrows the moral frame: "intervention" is cast as the offense, not the crisis that might be used to justify it. For a statesman navigating the early Cold War and Israel's precarious first decades, that wording is a defensive shield and a diplomatic signal flare. He isn't denouncing any particular country; he's drawing a bright procedural line in a world where procedures were routinely ignored.
The phrase "foreign power" is deliberately blunt. It collapses allies, patrons, and adversaries into the same suspect category, insisting that even friendly pressure carries the stink of coercion. The "against us" is equally strategic: it's not a pacifist objection to intervention in principle, but a claim to political adulthood for a state that was constantly being treated as a problem to be managed by bigger actors. Sharett, associated with a more cautious, diplomatic posture than some of his contemporaries, is also staking out legitimacy: whatever Israel does or doesn't do, outside forces shouldn't decide its fate.
Subtextually, the sentence anticipates the argument it wants to stop: that small states are fair game for "stabilization", "protection", or "balance". By refusing the euphemisms, Sharett frames intervention as a violation, not a remedy. It's a line meant for foreign capitals as much as for domestic audiences: a reminder that dependence can arrive wearing the costume of rescue.
The phrase "foreign power" is deliberately blunt. It collapses allies, patrons, and adversaries into the same suspect category, insisting that even friendly pressure carries the stink of coercion. The "against us" is equally strategic: it's not a pacifist objection to intervention in principle, but a claim to political adulthood for a state that was constantly being treated as a problem to be managed by bigger actors. Sharett, associated with a more cautious, diplomatic posture than some of his contemporaries, is also staking out legitimacy: whatever Israel does or doesn't do, outside forces shouldn't decide its fate.
Subtextually, the sentence anticipates the argument it wants to stop: that small states are fair game for "stabilization", "protection", or "balance". By refusing the euphemisms, Sharett frames intervention as a violation, not a remedy. It's a line meant for foreign capitals as much as for domestic audiences: a reminder that dependence can arrive wearing the costume of rescue.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Moshe
Add to List



