"I am appreciative of the Bush administration's commitment to fair trade by looking at the facts in this case and ruling affirmatively for the implementation of quotas in this specific category"
About this Quote
Coble’s sentence is a politician’s masterclass in praising and pressuring at the same time. On the surface, it’s gratitude toward the Bush administration for “fair trade.” Underneath, it’s a carefully lawyered argument for protectionism that refuses to admit it’s protectionism. “Looking at the facts” signals due process and technocratic neutrality, a rhetorical shield meant to make quotas sound like the inevitable outcome of objective analysis rather than a choice that favors domestic producers and the constituencies tied to them.
The word “affirmatively” does a lot of work. It suggests moral clarity and decisiveness, as if the only responsible stance is action. But the action in question - quotas - is exactly the kind of blunt instrument that free-trade rhetoric usually condemns. That tension is the point: Coble frames quotas not as a retreat from open markets but as the mechanism by which “fair trade” is enforced. It’s an attempt to reconcile two competing political demands of the era: Republican branding as pro-business and pro-trade, and local economic realities (textiles, furniture, manufacturing) that were being squeezed by import competition.
The final hedge, “in this specific category,” is the escape hatch. It narrows the blast radius, reassuring ideologues and donors that this isn’t a broad anti-trade pivot, just a targeted correction. The intent is coalition maintenance: applaud the administration, justify intervention, and keep the language clean enough that nobody has to call it what it is - government picking winners to prevent a local industry from becoming the next casualty of globalization.
The word “affirmatively” does a lot of work. It suggests moral clarity and decisiveness, as if the only responsible stance is action. But the action in question - quotas - is exactly the kind of blunt instrument that free-trade rhetoric usually condemns. That tension is the point: Coble frames quotas not as a retreat from open markets but as the mechanism by which “fair trade” is enforced. It’s an attempt to reconcile two competing political demands of the era: Republican branding as pro-business and pro-trade, and local economic realities (textiles, furniture, manufacturing) that were being squeezed by import competition.
The final hedge, “in this specific category,” is the escape hatch. It narrows the blast radius, reassuring ideologues and donors that this isn’t a broad anti-trade pivot, just a targeted correction. The intent is coalition maintenance: applaud the administration, justify intervention, and keep the language clean enough that nobody has to call it what it is - government picking winners to prevent a local industry from becoming the next casualty of globalization.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Howard
Add to List
