"I am committed to the principle that violence is never justified as a means of ameliorating a grievance"
About this Quote
A line like this isn’t trying to sound edgy; it’s trying to sound unbreakable. Coming from Justin Sane, a punk musician whose career sits in the long wake of protest music, the sentence reads like a preemptive boundary drawn against a genre stereotype: the idea that righteous anger naturally graduates into righteous force. The intent is reputational as much as philosophical. It signals to fans, critics, and the inevitable bad-faith readers that dissent can be loud without becoming lethal.
The phrasing is doing quiet work. “Committed to the principle” elevates the claim above mood or circumstance; it’s not “I don’t like violence,” it’s a vow. “Never justified” is absolute language, designed to shut down the most seductive argument violence always borrows: that the cause makes it clean. Then there’s the clincher, “as a means of ameliorating a grievance.” That’s a bureaucratic, almost clinical construction - “ameliorating” and “grievance” - which drains the romance out of retaliation. It reframes political conflict as something you address, not something you avenge.
The subtext is a challenge to a certain performance of radicalism. Plenty of cultural spaces celebrate anger as authenticity, even when it curdles into fantasies of payback. This line refuses to let catharsis masquerade as strategy. In a moment when protest movements are routinely judged by their worst footage, it also functions as shield: a way of insisting that the moral center of a movement can’t be held hostage by its most combustible edges.
The phrasing is doing quiet work. “Committed to the principle” elevates the claim above mood or circumstance; it’s not “I don’t like violence,” it’s a vow. “Never justified” is absolute language, designed to shut down the most seductive argument violence always borrows: that the cause makes it clean. Then there’s the clincher, “as a means of ameliorating a grievance.” That’s a bureaucratic, almost clinical construction - “ameliorating” and “grievance” - which drains the romance out of retaliation. It reframes political conflict as something you address, not something you avenge.
The subtext is a challenge to a certain performance of radicalism. Plenty of cultural spaces celebrate anger as authenticity, even when it curdles into fantasies of payback. This line refuses to let catharsis masquerade as strategy. In a moment when protest movements are routinely judged by their worst footage, it also functions as shield: a way of insisting that the moral center of a movement can’t be held hostage by its most combustible edges.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Justin
Add to List






