"I am concerned about how to reverse the process by which a fundamentalist right and a corporate elite were able to seize power in the United States"
About this Quote
Anxiety is doing double duty here: it signals urgency, but it also names a problem too big for tidy solutions. Gitlin isn’t asking how to win the next election; he’s asking how a particular governing alliance became structurally possible. The loaded pairing of “a fundamentalist right and a corporate elite” is the point. It implies an arrangement that, on paper, shouldn’t cohere: moral absolutists and profit-maximizers sharing a project. Gitlin’s sociologist’s eye is on the glue that binds them - institutions, media ecosystems, and organizational discipline - not on the personalities who happen to front the movement.
“Reverse the process” is a careful phrase. It rejects the comforting fantasy of a single coup or one villainous decision. Power, in this framing, is accumulated through “process”: decades of court capture, deregulation, think tanks, church networks, strategic polarization, and the slow normalization of anti-democratic maneuvers. The subtext is a warning against liberal nostalgia. If the takeover was procedural, the remedy has to be procedural too - rebuilding countervailing institutions, not just messaging better.
The verb “seize” adds moral heat: this wasn’t merely an electoral shift, it was an opportunistic grab enabled by unequal resources and asymmetrical tactics. Yet “were able to” quietly indicts everyone else. The question isn’t only what “they” did, but what conditions - fragmentation on the left, complacent centrism, a money-saturated political system - made the seizure feasible. Gitlin’s intent is diagnostic and strategic: map the machinery of power so resistance stops being reactive and starts becoming infrastructural.
“Reverse the process” is a careful phrase. It rejects the comforting fantasy of a single coup or one villainous decision. Power, in this framing, is accumulated through “process”: decades of court capture, deregulation, think tanks, church networks, strategic polarization, and the slow normalization of anti-democratic maneuvers. The subtext is a warning against liberal nostalgia. If the takeover was procedural, the remedy has to be procedural too - rebuilding countervailing institutions, not just messaging better.
The verb “seize” adds moral heat: this wasn’t merely an electoral shift, it was an opportunistic grab enabled by unequal resources and asymmetrical tactics. Yet “were able to” quietly indicts everyone else. The question isn’t only what “they” did, but what conditions - fragmentation on the left, complacent centrism, a money-saturated political system - made the seizure feasible. Gitlin’s intent is diagnostic and strategic: map the machinery of power so resistance stops being reactive and starts becoming infrastructural.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Todd
Add to List





