"I am convinced that military action will not prevent further acts of international terrorism against the United States"
About this Quote
Barbara Lee’s line lands with the blunt force of a dissenting vote cast in a moment engineered for unanimity. Delivered in the shadow of 9/11, it refuses the comforting arithmetic of retaliation: strike abroad, feel safe at home. The specific intent is surgical. She’s not offering pacifist sentimentality; she’s challenging the claim of effectiveness. “Convinced” signals moral and analytical certainty, while “will not prevent” aims straight at the policy premise behind open-ended war. It’s an argument about outcomes, not just ideals.
The subtext is sharper: the U.S. can’t bomb its way into a world where terrorism stops being a tactic. By framing terrorism as “international,” Lee hints at networks, grievances, and blowback that don’t obey borders. She’s also warning about the political temptation to treat military action as a substitute for strategy - a visible, televisable response that satisfies public anger and institutional momentum even when it’s misaligned with the problem.
Context turns the quote into an act of political risk. Lee was the lone “no” vote against the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, an instrument so broad it became a legal chassis for two decades of operations. Her sentence anticipates that elasticity: once “prevention” is promised, failure justifies expansion, and every new attack becomes proof that the war must continue. The rhetoric works because it punctures a national mood without lecturing it, offering a sober forecast when the culture was demanding certainty, closure, and a target.
The subtext is sharper: the U.S. can’t bomb its way into a world where terrorism stops being a tactic. By framing terrorism as “international,” Lee hints at networks, grievances, and blowback that don’t obey borders. She’s also warning about the political temptation to treat military action as a substitute for strategy - a visible, televisable response that satisfies public anger and institutional momentum even when it’s misaligned with the problem.
Context turns the quote into an act of political risk. Lee was the lone “no” vote against the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, an instrument so broad it became a legal chassis for two decades of operations. Her sentence anticipates that elasticity: once “prevention” is promised, failure justifies expansion, and every new attack becomes proof that the war must continue. The rhetoric works because it punctures a national mood without lecturing it, offering a sober forecast when the culture was demanding certainty, closure, and a target.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Barbara Lee, U.S. Representative — floor statement opposing the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), U.S. House of Representatives, Sept 14, 2001. |
More Quotes by Barbara
Add to List






