"I am not interested in power for power's sake, but I'm interested in power that is moral, that is right and that is good"
About this Quote
Power is the word King won’t let the comfortable redefine as dirty. In mid-century America, “power” was often coded as something bosses, cops, and segregationist politicians wielded, while moral leaders were expected to be pure, patient, and politely powerless. King refuses that bargain. He draws a hard line between domination and legitimate authority, insisting that the struggle for civil rights isn’t a plea for benevolence but a demand for capacity: the ability to change laws, budgets, policing, housing, and schools.
The first clause (“not interested in power for power’s sake”) is strategic inoculation. It anticipates the smear that Black liberation is simply revenge or a bid to flip the hierarchy. King knows critics will cast any assertion as “extremism,” so he preemptively disarms the caricature: he’s not chasing ego, spoils, or control.
Then he pivots: “but I’m interested in power that is moral.” That’s not softening; it’s raising the stakes. He’s redefining power as a tool of collective ethics, not personal appetite. The repetition of “moral… right… good” works like a cadence from the pulpit, but it’s also a political syllabus: power must answer to justice, not just procedure. Subtext: if your power maintains segregation, poverty, or violence, it may be legal, but it isn’t legitimate.
In the context of a movement navigating nonviolence, state repression, and accusations of communist agitation, King’s line is a reminder that nonviolent doesn’t mean nonconfrontational. It means power pursued without becoming the thing you’re fighting.
The first clause (“not interested in power for power’s sake”) is strategic inoculation. It anticipates the smear that Black liberation is simply revenge or a bid to flip the hierarchy. King knows critics will cast any assertion as “extremism,” so he preemptively disarms the caricature: he’s not chasing ego, spoils, or control.
Then he pivots: “but I’m interested in power that is moral.” That’s not softening; it’s raising the stakes. He’s redefining power as a tool of collective ethics, not personal appetite. The repetition of “moral… right… good” works like a cadence from the pulpit, but it’s also a political syllabus: power must answer to justice, not just procedure. Subtext: if your power maintains segregation, poverty, or violence, it may be legal, but it isn’t legitimate.
In the context of a movement navigating nonviolence, state repression, and accusations of communist agitation, King’s line is a reminder that nonviolent doesn’t mean nonconfrontational. It means power pursued without becoming the thing you’re fighting.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Martin
Add to List









