"I am now almost certain that we need more radiation for better health"
About this Quote
Cameron is tapping into a long-running countercurrent in public-health debate often called radiation hormesis: the claim that low doses of ionizing radiation might stimulate repair mechanisms and reduce disease risk. Whether or not you buy the science, the intent is clear. He’s challenging the dominant precautionary framework (especially the linear no-threshold model, which assumes any radiation dose carries some risk) by framing radiation not as poison but as a potentially underused stressor, like exercise or vaccines. That analogy is the subtext: controlled harm as a path to resilience.
The context is a world saturated with radiation anxiety, from nuclear accidents to medical imaging to environmental regulation. Cameron’s phrasing tries to pry apart “radiation” the phenomenon from “radiation” the panic-symbol. It also courts controversy by sounding like a blanket endorsement, when the debate lives in dosage, duration, and population-level uncertainty. That’s why it works: it’s compact enough to outrage, but precise enough (“almost certain,” “better health”) to claim the mantle of reasoned dissent.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Cameron, John. (2026, January 17). I am now almost certain that we need more radiation for better health. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-am-now-almost-certain-that-we-need-more-64386/
Chicago Style
Cameron, John. "I am now almost certain that we need more radiation for better health." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-am-now-almost-certain-that-we-need-more-64386/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I am now almost certain that we need more radiation for better health." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/i-am-now-almost-certain-that-we-need-more-64386/. Accessed 19 Feb. 2026.

