"I am struck by how casually we as a nation react to the carnage in Iraq"
About this Quote
A veteran lawmaker doesn’t say he’s "struck" by something unless he wants you to feel the jolt too. Charles Rangel’s line is built to shame a complacent audience, but it does it with a deceptively mild tool: the word "casually". Not "cruelly", not "indifferently" - casually. That choice lands because it accuses ordinary people, media routines, and political institutions of treating war like background noise, something you half-notice between weather and sports.
The phrase "we as a nation" is the real trapdoor. Rangel could blame an administration, the Pentagon, or Congress. Instead, he widens the circle of responsibility to include voters and spectators. It’s a rhetorical conscription: if the reaction is casual, then the moral failure is collective. "Carnage" seals the indictment. It refuses the sanitized vocabulary of "operations" and "progress", forcing a gruesome concreteness that official language often works to blur.
Context matters: Rangel was a prominent critic of the Iraq War and of the way it was sold and staffed - especially his argument that an all-volunteer force made it easier for the country to wage prolonged conflict without shared sacrifice. Read through that lens, the quote isn’t only grief; it’s a political critique of insulation. When the costs are borne by a narrow slice of Americans, everyone else can afford to react "casually". Rangel is pointing at the cultural mechanism that makes endless war possible: distance masquerading as normalcy.
The phrase "we as a nation" is the real trapdoor. Rangel could blame an administration, the Pentagon, or Congress. Instead, he widens the circle of responsibility to include voters and spectators. It’s a rhetorical conscription: if the reaction is casual, then the moral failure is collective. "Carnage" seals the indictment. It refuses the sanitized vocabulary of "operations" and "progress", forcing a gruesome concreteness that official language often works to blur.
Context matters: Rangel was a prominent critic of the Iraq War and of the way it was sold and staffed - especially his argument that an all-volunteer force made it easier for the country to wage prolonged conflict without shared sacrifice. Read through that lens, the quote isn’t only grief; it’s a political critique of insulation. When the costs are borne by a narrow slice of Americans, everyone else can afford to react "casually". Rangel is pointing at the cultural mechanism that makes endless war possible: distance masquerading as normalcy.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List
