"I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschilds appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand, Marx feels an instinctive inclination and a great respect for the Rothschilds"
About this Quote
Bakunin lobs this line like a grenade wrapped in a compliment. The surface is almost courtly: mutual “respect,” a cool-headed assurance that each side recognizes the other’s “merits.” But the politeness is the trap. He’s staging an impossible handshake between two archetypes of 19th-century political imagination: the Rothschilds as shorthand for high finance and dynastic capital, Marx as the prophet of proletarian revolt. The joke is that the handshake isn’t impossible at all.
Bakunin’s intent is polemical, aimed less at the Rothschilds than at Marxism’s appetite for centralization and its faith in historical inevitability. If capitalism and its critics can “appreciate” each other, Bakunin implies, it’s because they share an underlying temperament: a taste for system, hierarchy, and managerial power. His anarchist suspicion is that Marx’s revolutionary state would inherit capitalism’s command structure, just swapping owners for commissars. The “instinctive inclination” is doing heavy lifting: it suggests that beneath Marx’s moral rage is a psychological kinship with the very authority he denounces.
Context matters. Bakunin and Marx were not abstract rivals; they fought inside the First International, where the stakes were immediate: who would lead the left, and toward what end - federated self-organization or party discipline. Bakunin’s line weaponizes the era’s obsession with finance and conspiracy, flirting with the period’s ugly, antisemitic imagery by using “Rothschilds” as a synecdoche. That’s part of its power and its poison: it turns a theoretical dispute into a vivid social tableau, making Marxism look less like emancipation than an elite project with different branding.
Bakunin’s intent is polemical, aimed less at the Rothschilds than at Marxism’s appetite for centralization and its faith in historical inevitability. If capitalism and its critics can “appreciate” each other, Bakunin implies, it’s because they share an underlying temperament: a taste for system, hierarchy, and managerial power. His anarchist suspicion is that Marx’s revolutionary state would inherit capitalism’s command structure, just swapping owners for commissars. The “instinctive inclination” is doing heavy lifting: it suggests that beneath Marx’s moral rage is a psychological kinship with the very authority he denounces.
Context matters. Bakunin and Marx were not abstract rivals; they fought inside the First International, where the stakes were immediate: who would lead the left, and toward what end - federated self-organization or party discipline. Bakunin’s line weaponizes the era’s obsession with finance and conspiracy, flirting with the period’s ugly, antisemitic imagery by using “Rothschilds” as a synecdoche. That’s part of its power and its poison: it turns a theoretical dispute into a vivid social tableau, making Marxism look less like emancipation than an elite project with different branding.
Quote Details
| Topic | Sarcastic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Mikhail
Add to List




